Time |
Nick |
Message |
16:02 |
meeting |
Meeting started Fri May 6 16:02:18 2016 UTC. The chair is walterbender. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
16:02 |
|
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #endmeeting |
16:02 |
walterbender |
Alas, only three SLOB members here at the moment |
16:02 |
|
We have a lot to cover |
16:03 |
|
The agenda is at https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/[…]utes#Agenda_items |
16:04 |
|
#topic motion to pay for laboratoriosazucar.org domain |
16:04 |
|
it has been discussed in brief in the email thread |
16:04 |
cjl |
#link https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/[…]utes#Agenda_items |
16:04 |
samsongoddy |
serious?? that why we are here because they couldn't vote by mail |
16:04 |
|
noemu <noemu!~mariah 173-162-172-61-NewEngland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net> has joined #sugar-meeting |
16:04 |
walterbender |
Also, Bernie could make that decision unilaterally |
16:04 |
samsongoddy |
let just wait for the others, |
16:04 |
noemu |
hello, mariah here |
16:04 |
walterbender |
I will ask for an email vote |
16:04 |
samsongoddy |
okay |
16:05 |
walterbender |
any further discussion? |
16:05 |
davelab6 |
in the end sebastian gave me his account details and i logged in and my company paid for it |
16:05 |
walterbender |
davelab6, OK. thx |
16:05 |
samsongoddy |
nice one dave |
16:05 |
walterbender |
but it cou;d have/should have bee handled directly by the infrastructre team :P |
16:06 |
|
which leads to #topic treasurer postion |
16:06 |
cjl |
davelab6: Would it be possible to have it transferred, so when the time cimes for renewasl, it gets handled? |
16:06 |
walterbender |
see https://docs.google.com/docume[…]OUEX0ICRUkOc/edit |
16:06 |
|
cjl, I am certainly fine with that |
16:07 |
|
has everyone read Caryl's motions (there are 4) |
16:07 |
|
We have some outstanding open issues with two of the four |
16:07 |
samsongoddy |
yeah me too |
16:07 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
I just emailed some suggestions: http://lists.sugarlabs.org/arc[…]6-May/018124.html |
16:09 |
|
walter_ <walter_!~walter 146-115-134-246.c3-0.nwt-ubr1.sbo-nwt.ma.cable.rcn.com> has joined #sugar-meeting |
16:09 |
walter_ |
oops. my computer crashed |
16:09 |
|
I'm back |
16:10 |
davelab6 |
cjl: seb can arrange it im' sure |
16:10 |
cjl |
davelab6: That would begreat. |
16:10 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
Just to repeat what`s in the above link, the Financial Manager proposal is moving in the right direction but premature in my opinion, until its mechanics are better understood. |
16:11 |
icarito |
hi davelab6, arrange what? |
16:11 |
walter_ |
CanoeBerry, I think the 3rd and 4th motions are fine |
16:11 |
icarito |
btw seb=me ? |
16:12 |
walter_ |
I think the spirit of the first motion is fine, but I am sure you have some details you'd like sorted out... that is why we have been asking for comments |
16:12 |
|
walterbender has quit IRC |
16:12 |
walter_ |
I am not sold on the 2nd motion, and have been awaiting asnwers to my questions |
16:12 |
cjl |
icarito: transfer of registered domain name to "the right place". |
16:12 |
|
walter_ is now known as walterbender |
16:13 |
icarito |
ah just reading the backlog sorry |
16:13 |
|
of course |
16:13 |
davelab6 |
icarito: :) |
16:13 |
cjl |
cool |
16:13 |
walterbender |
maybe we can get into #1 and #2 off line |
16:13 |
|
Ibiam <Ibiam!294f0706 gateway/web/freenode/ip.41.79.7.6> has joined #sugar-meeting |
16:13 |
walterbender |
shall we move on to Yoruba? |
16:13 |
Ibiam |
hello everyone |
16:13 |
davelab6 |
i think so |
16:14 |
walterbender |
#topic Yoruba i18n proposal |
16:14 |
tony37 |
Yoruba is motion 3? |
16:14 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
walter_: agreed 3rd and 4th motions within GDoc are very helpful, and 2nd could have its mechanics cleaned up a bit too. |
16:15 |
cjl |
detects lack of clarity |
16:15 |
walterbender |
tony37, sorry. Yoruba is Topic 3 |
16:15 |
icarito |
adam such a long email.. |
16:15 |
walterbender |
It is clear we don't have consensus yet on the Treasurer motions |
16:15 |
|
Cerlyn has quit IRC |
16:16 |
kaametza |
hi everybody! |
16:16 |
walterbender |
so we should discuss off line and get on with the other topics |
16:16 |
samsongoddy |
hi kaametza |
16:16 |
walterbender |
Has everyone reviewed the Yoruba proposal??? |
16:16 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
LinkÉ |
16:16 |
icarito |
there are 4 slobs here has there been a vote on anything? |
16:16 |
walterbender |
icarito, there are only three here |
16:16 |
icarito |
ah I guess ClaudiaU_ is not online |
16:17 |
tony37 |
Is there a url for Yoruba proposal as we are considering it? |
16:17 |
|
Cerlyn <Cerlyn!~AndChat18 172.56.26.90> has joined #sugar-meeting |
16:17 |
walterbender |
ClaudiaU_, is logged in by not actually here |
16:17 |
|
tony37, I realize the link I posted in the agenda is only part of the proposal |
16:17 |
|
I have sent it by email several times... |
16:17 |
cjl |
spreadshhet here: https://drive.google.com/file/[…]M3o5R2ZSQUl3/view |
16:17 |
walterbender |
will find it again |
16:18 |
icarito |
while I love the meeting.sugarlabs.org IRC infrastructure and it has served us well, maybe SLOBS should consider a more agile voting mechanism, just a suggestion |
16:18 |
kaametza |
it looks good, congrats samsongoddy and cjl |
16:18 |
tony37 |
There has been a lot of amendments and discussion, so I want to be looking at the same page |
16:19 |
walterbender |
https://docs.google.com/docume[…]/edit?usp=sharing |
16:19 |
|
milestones and $$ begin on Page 3 |
16:19 |
tony37 |
Thanks |
16:20 |
samsongoddy |
thanks walter |
16:20 |
walterbender |
This is straight forward with the exception of the first Milestone |
16:20 |
kaametza |
the only suggestion I nmade to Samson is to consider the initial $350 as finantial costs of the project, as there will be for example international transfer cost |
16:20 |
walterbender |
we have never done it quite like this, but a case has been made that these additional overhead costs are necessary |
16:21 |
|
Cerlyn has quit IRC |
16:21 |
walterbender |
FWIW, we are trying to get some hardware to the i18n team in NI through other channels. |
16:22 |
|
it has been a struggle :P |
16:22 |
|
Any further discussion? |
16:22 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
Is there an impact assessment, explaining how many children (or teachers, etc) might/will be impacted by this work over the coming 5 years, and if so can we get a link? |
16:22 |
walterbender |
I will push for a vote by email as we don't have our quorum :( |
16:22 |
|
Cerlyn <Cerlyn!~AndChat18 2607:fb90:1220:466a:4b3f:b082:57eb:5f5a> has joined #sugar-meeting |
16:22 |
cjl |
I proposed the first Milestone to address pragmatic concerns that samsongoddy had about getting things going. |
16:23 |
tony37 |
My concern is that we are setting a precedent by paying for translation as opposed to infrastructure to support localization |
16:23 |
Ibiam |
what other cchannels are you talking about |
16:23 |
walterbender |
Ibiam, some individual community members |
16:23 |
cjl |
tony37: That precedent has already been set in the past. |
16:23 |
walterbender |
tony37, we have set this precedent already |
16:23 |
tony37 |
I am new and was not aware of that beyond the Aymara case |
16:24 |
cjl |
Aymara L10n got about 20K words from Edgar |
16:24 |
walterbender |
we have tried with, for example, gurani |
16:24 |
tony37 |
Do we have a criteria for which languages will be elgible for payment |
16:24 |
cjl |
tony37: Other proposals died aborning (e.g. Haiti) |
16:24 |
kaametza |
walterbender, is Guarani |
16:25 |
walterbender |
tony37, it is a judgment call in each case |
16:25 |
icarito |
(many Aymara strings were translated by edgar as a volunteer initially) |
16:25 |
cjl |
tony37: There were not fixed rules, but discussion. |
16:26 |
walterbender |
back to CanoeBerry's question: we discussed the opportunity for Yoruba in NI as potentially unleashing more users |
16:26 |
icarito |
it is necessary to pay translators or other team members to finish and polish the work |
16:26 |
cjl |
The criteria were in general an active path to users, low coverage fo localizers (volunteer). |
16:26 |
samsongoddy |
yeah about that |
16:26 |
walterbender |
it is a major language group in a large country we'd like to target |
16:26 |
|
but hard to say if in the end it will matter |
16:26 |
icarito |
80/20 rule comes to mind - polish is 80% of the time and is not as much fun |
16:26 |
|
(the verb polish, not the language ;-) |
16:26 |
walterbender |
we are in parallel doing some out reach |
16:27 |
|
in the form of some workshops |
16:27 |
|
in Lagos |
16:27 |
samsongoddy |
that why i and walter is setting a workshop in NI to bring more users |
16:27 |
walterbender |
but the details are still sketchy |
16:27 |
davelab6 |
tony37: isnt the money from trip advisor FOR paying for translation, though, not general funds? |
16:27 |
walterbender |
the i18n needs to be used to bootstrap |
16:28 |
tony37 |
My understanding is the funds are to promote localization |
16:28 |
walterbender |
davelab6, YES. but we welcome volunteers too :) |
16:28 |
|
I defer to cjl to manage the balance |
16:28 |
davelab6 |
right |
16:29 |
|
cjl: what is your vote for the motion? |
16:29 |
kaametza |
tony37, it actually says to create a fund to support translations of Sugar - but nobody seems interested on the fund creation |
16:29 |
tony37 |
If we pay $4000 for Yoruba, can we say no to Sesotho or Hausa? |
16:29 |
cjl |
davelab6: as laid out inthe top part of that message, I think I should be acting as an advocate for L10n proposals, not a voting member. |
16:29 |
davelab6 |
tony37: sure can |
16:29 |
|
tony37: why not? |
16:30 |
walterbender |
tony37, I'd love to get Hausa too |
16:30 |
tony37 |
Then there are five indigenous languages in the Philippines |
16:30 |
walterbender |
it would be worthwhile to invest in f we have the funds, IMHO |
16:30 |
|
tony37, we should be investing in those too |
16:30 |
davelab6 |
tony37: write up the plan and pose a motion :) |
16:30 |
tony37 |
Agreed, but in enabling localization by Sugar sites |
16:30 |
samsongoddy |
ibiam is here, he can talk about the ibo language |
16:30 |
davelab6 |
tony37: i dont see other languages as a reason to not do these ones |
16:31 |
walterbender |
@tony37 there are 300+ in NI :P |
16:31 |
|
davelab6, +1 |
16:31 |
icarito |
there are about 50 in peru, several of them with tens of thousands of speakers and many with XO laptops |
16:31 |
tony37 |
Perhaps we can frame this as a pilot test |
16:31 |
davelab6 |
tony37: this one can - if it goes well, i hope it will - serve as a reference/case study for more |
16:31 |
|
tony37: raising money to pay for things is harder without positive case studies of past success |
16:31 |
samsongoddy |
my primary was igbo and yoruba, because that were SL will get users |
16:31 |
tony37 |
50 languages at $4000 each is more than we have funds |
16:32 |
davelab6 |
tony37: we get more funds then |
16:32 |
walterbender |
tony37, we need to start somewhere |
16:32 |
davelab6 |
tony37: its only 200k |
16:32 |
tony37 |
It is 1000 XOs |
16:32 |
Ibiam |
the proposal for igbo language will come after the one for yoruba is granted |
16:32 |
davelab6 |
tony37: right, its a small amount |
16:32 |
samsongoddy |
according to our facebook page, our fans are in Port Harcourt(Igbo), Lagos(yoruba) and abuja(Hausa) |
16:33 |
|
yes ibiam that is the plan |
16:33 |
cjl |
tony37: I think you over-estimate the number of such circumstances where a "well-suited" language (potential user-base and path to deployment) meets a localizer. |
16:34 |
tony37 |
If we have a deployment in a location with an indigenous language there will be speakers of that language |
16:34 |
cjl |
tony37: I am in favor of driving towards bootstrapping, no question. |
16:34 |
walterbender |
tony37, I think the idea here is to make an effort in Yoruba to encourage more pickup on Sugar in NI |
16:35 |
cjl |
I do think getting Glucoase and Fructose should be priorities. Let tehm do Honey. |
16:35 |
Ibiam |
tony37, there is no deployment in Nigeria right now and i agree with walter |
16:35 |
walterbender |
cjl, +1 |
16:35 |
tony37 |
I am ok with this if it is understood that we are paying for translation to get started and not to establish a way to go forward for all languages |
16:35 |
walterbender |
tony37, +1 |
16:36 |
cjl |
tony37: I would agree with that. |
16:36 |
davelab6 |
tony37: i think the new website can clarify that translation efforts may need to raise their own funds |
16:36 |
Ibiam |
the only languages right now that we plan on translating are the most popular ones, which are just three |
16:37 |
|
igbo, hausa and yoruba |
16:37 |
davelab6 |
https://github.com/sugarlabs/w[…]9a0e4f7cb907ee899 |
16:37 |
walterbender |
any more discussion? |
16:37 |
cjl |
davelab6: I'm researching potential funders or sourecs of volunteers in "digitally disadvantaged" languages. |
16:37 |
davelab6 |
cjl: awesome! |
16:37 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
Am confused about NI connection with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yoruba_language É |
16:37 |
|
is NI NicaraguaÉ |
16:38 |
cjl |
NG? |
16:38 |
Ibiam |
nope Nigeria |
16:38 |
walterbender |
CanoeBerry2_, my mistake |
16:38 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
OK! |
16:38 |
walterbender |
NG |
16:38 |
cjl |
Know your ISO-4166 codes people. . . |
16:38 |
samsongoddy |
NG rather |
16:38 |
icarito |
reading backlog, our router crashed... :-/ |
16:38 |
davelab6 |
lol |
16:38 |
samsongoddy |
lolz |
16:39 |
walterbender |
next topic |
16:39 |
|
#topic GPLv3 |
16:39 |
tony37 |
Do we have a motion or will this be done by email? |
16:39 |
walterbender |
tony37, yes |
16:39 |
samsongoddy |
the voting will be via email |
16:39 |
walterbender |
we have a motion and it will voted on by mail |
16:40 |
tony37 |
Walter, will you submit the motion for voting? |
16:40 |
walterbender |
has anyone read the GPLv3 thread? |
16:40 |
|
tony37, yes... I will do it tonight |
16:40 |
tony37 |
Thanks |
16:40 |
icarito |
i thought davelab6 submitted a motion, do motions have to come from SLOBS members then> |
16:40 |
|
? |
16:41 |
|
tony37 has quit IRC |
16:42 |
davelab6 |
i thought motions had to be from members only |
16:42 |
kaametza |
anybody counting the meetings assistance for SLOBS / no quorum for a monthly meeting is a shame |
16:43 |
walterbender |
I will make motions by email |
16:43 |
|
can we move on please |
16:44 |
icarito |
just like to state that the only party who might have had an issue with GPLv3 (OLPCA) already mentioned they are fine with it (in the github discussion, comment by James Cameron) |
16:44 |
|
OLPC OS already comes with a bunch of GPLv3 software including several activities |
16:44 |
|
tony37 <tony37!~webchat rev-18-85-44-69.sugarlabs.org> has joined #sugar-meeting |
16:45 |
walterbender |
icarito, I will send a motion by email |
16:45 |
icarito |
so it should be an easy motion to approve |
16:45 |
|
:-) |
16:45 |
davelab6 |
https://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/[…]r_Labs/Governance doesn't specify anything about motions |
16:45 |
walterbender |
there does not seem to be an other objections |
16:45 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
Yes, lets move on. At the same time many would appreciate a basic explanation as to why GPLv3 is better (and how/who it helps) from proponents on mailing list if they have time later? |
16:45 |
walterbender |
davelab6, I agree |
16:45 |
|
CanoeBerry2_, this was all spelled out in the various threads |
16:46 |
|
we can reiterate in the motion with some links |
16:46 |
|
#topic GSoC stpends |
16:46 |
|
background |
16:47 |
|
every year Google grants stipends of $500 for the mentors based on the number of projects |
16:47 |
|
we decided the first year to put that money in the general funds |
16:47 |
|
and have rolled that decision over in subsequent years |
16:48 |
|
a mentor this year has asked that we revisit that decision |
16:48 |
|
personally, I am fine with giving the option to keep the money to the mentors as they put in a lot of time and effort |
16:49 |
|
would use the money to buy hardware for deployments (bypassing the SLOB process) |
16:49 |
|
but we should discuss here... |
16:49 |
|
</ background> |
16:50 |
icarito |
I am that mentor - I have no problem with being public about it - it would be good if Sugar Labs acknowledged that our community includes volunteers in the field as opposed to other GSoC organizations - |
16:50 |
walterbender |
icarito, not sure I understand what you are saying |
16:50 |
davelab6 |
nor m |
16:50 |
|
but i think eli would also appreciate the $500 |
16:50 |
cjl |
My take (FWIW) is that the money is the mentors. That first year the mentors all stepped up to donate and it has been nice that many have followed that fine example. |
16:51 |
icarito |
sorry if I was not clear - the point is we need the funds |
16:51 |
elih |
I know it would be a big help for me as well, davelab6 knows my situation but others may not. |
16:51 |
|
This is my first real gig in free software and the learning that is happening in invaluable to me, so thanks Dave and Walter for the opportunity. But, I am in a transition phase of my career without much income so anything would be life changing for me. |
16:52 |
walterbender |
I am fine with letting the mentors distrubte the money as they see fit (and some of it may be put into the general funds if they decide on that too) |
16:52 |
icarito |
we put a lot of volunteer time to Sugar and we need to be able to sustain it |
16:52 |
|
thank you walter and SLOBs for considering it |
16:53 |
walterbender |
I will write up a motion (via email again) :P |
16:53 |
tony37 |
I would think this is a task for our finance manager. The money is intended to go to the mentors and so a mentor should be able to request if from the finance manager, the balance to the general fund. |
16:53 |
walterbender |
two more topics... |
16:54 |
|
tony37, moot for the moment, since we don't have a finance manager or agree as to the role of such a position |
16:54 |
tony37 |
+1 |
16:54 |
walterbender |
in brief |
16:54 |
kaametza |
tony37, to have a FM would only make sense if there was a yearly budget-fundraise in mind |
16:54 |
walterbender |
#topic Google RISE |
16:54 |
|
davelab6, pointed me to this program |
16:55 |
|
https://www.google.com/edu/res[…]oogle-rise-awards |
16:55 |
|
it looks great |
16:55 |
|
but I think it is really for deployments, not for SL itself |
16:55 |
icarito |
we have tried to get SFC to support deployment level work before - might be worth another try? |
16:56 |
walterbender |
what I recommend is that on the ground teams apply and that we support those applications |
16:56 |
|
we will need to talk to the SFC, agreed |
16:56 |
|
maybe CanoeBerry2_ can talk to tony? |
16:57 |
|
some deployments have their own entities already, |
16:57 |
davelab6 |
tony37: back on the last topic, actually i dont get why there is a motion about this; i didn't agree with anyone that my mentor fee would go to the general fund, so i dont see how this is an issue :) |
16:57 |
|
walterbender: that sounds good to me |
16:57 |
walterbender |
davelab6, I think it is a bit more complicated than that |
16:58 |
tony37 |
AFIK, the money goes to SugarLabs and SugarLabs has a policy that the money goes to the general fund |
16:58 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
fwiw (on the prior point) GSoC specifies funds go to the "mentoring organization" |
16:58 |
walterbender |
davelab6, I think (could be misremmbering) that Google gives the money to the orgs on behalf of the mentors) |
16:58 |
icarito |
"RISE Awards are limited to not-for-profit |
16:58 |
|
organizations with charitable registration status or a fiscal sponsor" <= this is a limiting factor, do you thinkg Sugar Labs / SFC can be that organization or would we need to find a local sponsor? |
16:59 |
davelab6 |
walterbender + CanoeBerry2_ aha :) well then this makes snese |
16:59 |
|
thanks for clarifying |
16:59 |
icarito |
it would be really helpful if Sugar Labs would be willing to be that organization |
16:59 |
tony37 |
Is charitable registration in US? |
17:00 |
icarito |
tony37, in any of the following countries ... (including USA) |
17:00 |
davelab6 |
i think it makes sense for SL to stand in as an org for deployments that are not self-incorporated, but that might be against the RISE rules |
17:00 |
walterbender |
tony37, not sure |
17:00 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
1-hour warning |
17:00 |
icarito |
elegible countries include USA |
17:00 |
|
citing from https://www.google.com/edu/res[…].html#!guidelines |
17:01 |
walterbender |
CanoeBerry2_, can you please discuss this with Tony at the SFC? and report back? |
17:01 |
|
the last topic is another motion to vote on... the vision statement |
17:01 |
kaametza |
seems like a good #idea to celebrate the 10th anniversary of Sugar winning the rise award :D |
17:01 |
walterbender |
email on that one too. |
17:01 |
|
samsongoddy has quit IRC |
17:01 |
tony37 |
There is a potetial applicant in Pakistan |
17:01 |
walterbender |
tony37, I can imagine many of the deplyments you work with could be eligible |
17:02 |
kaametza |
I been thinking to promote the production of 3 empowering Activities for the anniersary |
17:03 |
walterbender |
anything else for today? |
17:03 |
kaametza |
if anybody has ideasor would like to support please let me know |
17:03 |
davelab6 |
kaametza: ? |
17:04 |
|
kaametza: what do you menan '10th anniversary of Sugar winning the rise award'? |
17:04 |
|
:) |
17:04 |
kaametza |
this year Sugar will celebrate its 10th anniversay |
17:05 |
davelab6 |
walterbender: i have a question that came up when i met with elih earlier this week |
17:05 |
walterbender |
kaametza, SL began in 2008 |
17:05 |
davelab6 |
walterbender: the original interaction design work done by pentagram |
17:05 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
walterbender: tony37: yes... Google RISE should be considered+promoted where we can. |
17:05 |
kaametza |
I mean Sugar not Sugar Labs |
17:05 |
davelab6 |
walterbender: i couldnt find any trace of the development work products online |
17:05 |
|
walterbender: do you know if they were kept anywhere or have been lost? |
17:06 |
kaametza |
so I was thinking we should put some effort to it |
17:06 |
cjl |
davelab6: have you looked on d.l.o? |
17:07 |
kaametza |
I proposed the MinEdu Peryu to fund the production of 3 empowering activities, but the goberment is changing this year and there is no way to get funding approved |
17:07 |
davelab6 |
cjl: ? |
17:07 |
|
kaametza: https://github.com/sugarlabs/w[…]3fd43d739d2ab149f :) |
17:07 |
cjl |
dev.laptop.org |
17:08 |
|
samsongoddy <samsongoddy!294f0706 gateway/web/freenode/ip.41.79.7.6> has joined #sugar-meeting |
17:08 |
davelab6 |
cjl: i mean UI diagram sketches, brainstorming notes, etc |
17:09 |
kaametza |
davelab6, so I' looking for finding options |
17:10 |
|
funding sorry my keyboard died recently |
17:10 |
davelab6 |
kaametza: what is an empowering activity? |
17:10 |
|
Ibiam has quit IRC |
17:10 |
kaametza |
so reading the guidelines we might be able to apply |
17:11 |
samsongoddy |
i am back |
17:11 |
|
whats up |
17:11 |
davelab6 |
kaametza: which guidelines :) |
17:11 |
walterbender |
davelab6, I will try to find the original docs from Pentagram |
17:11 |
|
Ibiam <Ibiam!294f0706 gateway/web/freenode/ip.41.79.7.6> has joined #sugar-meeting |
17:11 |
kaametza |
after months of research I have some key ppointer as to what information require for example young girls that are not getting at school |
17:11 |
cjl |
davelab6: Google RISE |
17:12 |
davelab6 |
cjl: got it |
17:12 |
|
kaametza: i think its a great idea! :) i suggest to draft something on the wiki or in google docs or whatever :) |
17:12 |
|
walterbender: awesome :D |
17:13 |
kaametza |
I have a draft I can translate to share |
17:13 |
davelab6 |
walterbender: are you thinking digital or physical files? |
17:13 |
walterbender |
davelab6, both |
17:13 |
|
I need to look... it was 10 years ago |
17:13 |
tony37 |
Sorry, got to go, bye |
17:13 |
|
tony37 has quit IRC |
17:14 |
walterbender |
I need to go too... sorry |
17:14 |
davelab6 |
all good |
17:14 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
Thanks All |
17:14 |
walterbender |
thanks... |
17:14 |
samsongoddy |
bye!! |
17:14 |
davelab6 |
walterbender: eli and i hope to see the phyiscal ones at wiki weekend if possible :D |
17:14 |
walterbender |
we covered a lot of grund |
17:14 |
|
davelab6, I will do my best |
17:15 |
icarito |
first sugar-related bug in d.l.o is 10 years ago at 2006-06-14 |
17:15 |
davelab6 |
walterbender: no pressure! :) |
17:15 |
icarito |
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/2 |
17:15 |
elih |
anything from pentagram on UI animation would be interesting to me :) |
17:15 |
samsongoddy |
hello walter i just sent you a private message |
17:15 |
walterbender |
icarito, I misunderstood. Sugar development began in 2005. Sugar Labs began in 2008 |
17:18 |
CanoeBerry2_ |
Next SL board mtg here Friday June 3rd 16:00 UTC? Lets try for a legal quorum then! |
17:18 |
icarito |
walterbender, found first commit! https://github.com/sugarlabs/s[…]s/master?page=217 - April 19th 2006 |
17:21 |
|
davelab6 has quit IRC |
17:22 |
|
CanoeBerry2_ has quit IRC |
17:23 |
walterbender |
#end-meeting |
17:23 |
meeting |
Meeting ended Fri May 6 17:23:15 2016 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. (v 0.1.4) |
17:23 |
|
Minutes: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/s[…]-06T16:02:18.html |
17:23 |
|
Log: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/s[…]16-05-06T16:02:18 |