Time |
Nick |
Message |
13:59 |
meeting |
Meeting started Sat Dec 4 13:59:59 2010 UTC. The chair is silbe. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
13:59 |
|
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #endmeeting |
14:00 |
silbe |
#meetingname activity_central |
14:00 |
meeting |
The meeting name has been set to 'activity_central' |
14:00 |
SMParrish |
silbe: Good morning |
14:01 |
silbe |
bernie, SMParrish, alsroot, tch: friendly meeting reminder ;) |
14:01 |
|
m_anish_afk: dito ;) |
14:02 |
|
I don't think I see Pablo... |
14:02 |
alsroot |
hi all |
14:02 |
silbe |
Good evening SMParrish, alsroot :) |
14:08 |
|
hmm, doesn't look like bernie, m_anish_afk or Pablo will turn up. |
14:09 |
|
there's no agenda in the wiki, so I'd propose the following: |
14:09 |
|
1. EMail addrs |
14:09 |
|
2. Reports: - alsroot - silbe - smparrish - m_anish - tch |
14:09 |
|
3. Various |
14:10 |
|
any additions or alterations? |
14:11 |
|
ok, let's start then |
14:11 |
|
#topic ac.com email addresses |
14:13 |
|
I've created activitycentral.com email addresses for alsroot, m_anish_afk (anish), bernie, dfarning, myself (silbe), SMParrish and tch. |
14:14 |
|
as dfarning explained, usage of these addresses is going to be our primary means of advertising for the next few months, so please use them whenever appropriate. |
14:14 |
|
arjs <arjs!7aa29444 gateway/web/freenode/ip.122.162.148.68> has joined #sugar-meeting |
14:14 |
silbe |
and if I overlooked someone who should have an ac.com address, please tell me. |
14:15 |
|
#topic Reports |
14:15 |
|
alsroot: the stage is yours :) |
14:16 |
alsroot |
dunno, didn't have particular ac related work.. |
14:16 |
silbe |
alsroot: ok. Anything you're going to work on next week? |
14:17 |
alsroot |
works on http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/P[…]form_Team/Roadmap primarily |
14:18 |
silbe |
I have no idea what anything on that page means, but I guess that's ok ;) |
14:18 |
|
(well, except for aslo, of course) |
14:20 |
alsroot |
thats just part of my "support upstream" work within ac |
14:20 |
|
..I guess |
14:21 |
silbe |
personally, I've been working on cleaning up the Patchwork queue. We're now down to about 100 (from over 300) patches in the queue. I was able to push a bunch of patches, but we're still blocked because I didn't get hold of erikos for long enough. I'm still hopeful we'll be able to unblock within the next week, however. |
14:22 |
|
once we got the new process agreed on, I'll get a bunch of my own outstanding patches through review and start working on getting the remaining Dextrose patches ready for submission. |
14:22 |
|
SMParrish: you're next |
14:24 |
|
BTW, 2011-01-14 sounds fine. |
14:24 |
SMParrish |
I have been working on a new release, had some patch collisions that I got resolved this morning. Also am starting the work to merge our buildsystem and DSD's to start making Dextrose3 builds |
14:24 |
|
silbe did you get my email about needing a branched Sugar with our patchset |
14:24 |
silbe |
SMParrish: what's the difference between our current and dsd's build system? |
14:24 |
|
SMParrish: ^ ("2011-01-14 sounds fine") |
14:25 |
SMParrish |
silbe: For the XO-1 we use jffs2 and the new one uses ubifs. We also have some customizations that need to be ported over |
14:26 |
|
so we will be changing filesystems on the XO1 |
14:27 |
|
we also are going to have to address the yum memory issues since we will be basing on F14 and people may want to update the base os |
14:27 |
silbe |
that reminds me: can you build an ext3 image and/or a tarball as well? That would help a lot with testing, as we could install to external storage (SD card, USB stick) and keep the system on NAND / internal SD card unaffected. |
14:27 |
SMParrish |
I am going to be talking with the RH yum maintainer and see what we can do |
14:27 |
silbe |
it would also help a user who has a broken NAND (chatted with him on #sugar this week) |
14:28 |
SMParrish |
silbe: Sure the build system does that I just have not been posting them |
14:28 |
silbe |
SMParrish: looking forward to that. I suppose this doesn't block our other yum update work (updating from just our own repositories)? |
14:29 |
|
SMParrish: thanks! |
14:29 |
SMParrish |
yw |
14:30 |
silbe |
SMParrish: the ability to test in a VM (=> regular PC bootloader, non-XO kernel) would help as well. ;) |
14:31 |
|
m_anish_afk: would be next. Maybe he'll join later. |
14:31 |
SMParrish |
silbe: I'll look into that should not be too difficult to use stock kernel |
14:31 |
silbe |
SMParrish: thanks again! |
14:31 |
|
tch doesn't seem to be here either :-/ |
14:32 |
|
he's been working on the notifications stuff and even posted a patch upstream, but I still don't see updated mockups :( |
14:33 |
|
#topic Various |
14:33 |
|
anything else someone would like to talk about? |
14:34 |
lucian |
was thinking perhaps yum would run on pypy with lower memory usage |
14:35 |
|
but that wouldn't solve the distribution problems |
14:35 |
silbe |
lucian: is PyPy complete enough now that it would run yum? |
14:36 |
lucian |
silbe: it's fully 2.5 compatible + ctypes |
14:36 |
silbe |
(let's continue this after the meeting) |
14:36 |
lucian |
sure |
14:36 |
silbe |
I don't see anyone else speaking up, so let's finish |
14:36 |
|
3 |
14:37 |
lucian |
2 |
14:37 |
SMParrish |
1 |
14:37 |
silbe |
#endmeeting |
14:37 |
meeting |
Meeting ended Sat Dec 4 14:37:35 2010 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. (v 0.1.4) |
14:37 |
|
Minutes: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/s[…]-04T13:59:59.html |
14:37 |
|
Log: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/s[…]10-12-04T13:59:59 |