| 04:56:33 | Topic: Trademark applications from Local Labs | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 04:56:37 | LINK | mchua | http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-June/011237.html |
| 04:56:54 | INFO | mchua | We have trademark usage applications from the following places: |
| 04:57:02 | INFO | mchua | * Colombia * Paraguay Educa * Argentina * Chile * Peru * DC |
| 04:57:14 | INFO | mchua | We have been blocked by lack of links to the actual applications. |
| 04:58:29 | INFO | mchua | Walter says the words "TM REQUEST" should be in the subject lines for this, and that they should have been sent to list, but there are no emails from these countries with that subject on a public list (that I could find). |
| 05:36:54 | INFO | mchua | Mel can't find subject lines with "TM REQUEST" in them in either iaep or slobs archives |
| 05:37:42 | AGREED | mchua | This agenda item is being dropped, but people are encouraged (very very encouraged!) to resend their local labs' TM applications to SLOBs and cc iaep, and we'll get to them then. So if this is blocking you, please pipe up with a quick email! |
| 05:37:55 | Topic: Ooo4Kids logo display request | ||
| 06:17:35 | LINK | mchua | http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-June/011240.html |
| 06:21:10 | INFO | mchua | Main Oo4Kids contact is Eric Bachard, eric.bachard at free.fr |
| 06:21:21 | INFO | mchua | Oo4kids requests permission to place our logo on their "partners" page |
| 06:21:56 | AGREED | mchua | YES (motion passes, Bernie, Walter, Adam and Mel +1, no -1) |
| 06:21:59 | LINK | mchua | http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-June/011263.html |
| 06:22:11 | INFO | mchua | Added to "trademark permissions granted" list |
| 06:22:14 | LINK | mchua | http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Trademark_permissions_granted |
| 06:23:24 | Topic: F11+0.88+XO-1.* as a SL project | ||
| 06:23:47 | INFO | mchua | The broader topic under discussion here is "what is a SL project?" (as in, what does it entail, what does it mean for a project to be a SL project - rights and responsibilities)? |
| 06:23:58 | INFO | mchua | This is a simple question, but we need to actually agree on the answer. |
| 06:24:05 | LINK | mchua | http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-June/011241.html |
| 06:27:11 | LINK | mchua | http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-July/011278.html |
| 06:27:26 | LINK | mchua | http://lists.sugarlabs.org/archive/iaep/2010-July/011284.html |
| 06:29:04 | INFO | mchua | It was agreed last week that Paraguay Educa should list the F11+0.88+Xo-1.* project on the wiki sidebar. |
| 06:29:07 | LINK | mchua | http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team/Sugar-0.88 |
| 06:37:31 | INFO | mchua | It was also agreed that the project should have full use of SL Infrastructure resources. |
| 06:39:55 | INFO | mchua | So I'm going to make it a quick agenda item, draft a motion and see if we can get discussion/consensus/approval around it. |
| 06:40:36 | LINK | mchua | http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Sugar_Labs/Project_Guidelines |
| 06:41:36 | INFO | mchua | the current page asays projects start as SIGs, then apply to SLOBs for project status. |
| 06:42:39 | ACTION | mchua | mchua to shoot this page out to the iaep list and ask if anyone thinks it needs more - if it's not blocking anything, we can skip it for now, I think. |
| 06:42:58 | Topic: Other business | ||
| 06:47:34 | INFO | mchua | We have a question for SLOBs from Kevin Mark. |
| 06:47:34 | LINK | mchua | #link |
| 06:47:34 | INFO | mchua | Kevin Mark: I was confused about the hierarchy of who should be the deciding organization for who determines what version of sugar is used in the field. There are more than 500,000 users and many people outside of OLPC and Sugar Labs that will have to support that choice (of using 0.88) as well as the support that OLPC and Sugar Labs in Boston and elsewhere will have to provide." #info "I dont know how a new 3rd party like Activity Ce |
| 06:47:41 | INFO | mchua | "There are more than 500,000 users and many people outside of OLPC and Sugar Labs that will have to support that choice (of using 0.88) as well as the support that OLPC and Sugar Labs in Boston and elsewhere will have to provide. I dont know how a new 3rd party like Activity Central is involved in this and what role they should be taking as they are untested and lacking the kind of resouces that OLPC and Sugar Labs have at the moment. |
| 06:47:55 | ACTION | mchua | mchua to shoot this to slobs and iaep lists for further Q&A |
| 06:47:56 | Topic: Next week's agenda | ||
| 06:48:03 | INFO | mchua | * Revisit "what's a project?" |
| 06:48:43 | INFO | mchua | * Ask again: what are our biggest issues right now? How are we doing towards our goals? (What are they?) |
Here is the Log. More meetings are available under http://me.etin.gs/sugar-meeting/.