Web   ·   Wiki   ·   Activities   ·   Blog   ·   Lists   ·   Chat   ·   Meeting   ·   Bugs   ·   Git   ·   Translate   ·   Archive   ·   People   ·   Donate

#sugar-meeting, 2018-08-08

 « Previous day | Index | Today | Next day »     Channels | Search | Join

All times shown according to UTC.

Time Nick Message
00:24 Metacity23 <Metacity23!~Metacity@190-207-43-37.dyn.dsl.cantv.net> has joined #sugar-meeting
00:24 Metacity23 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
00:24 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
00:24 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
00:24 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
00:24 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
00:24 Metacity23 has quit IRC
00:40 walterbender <walterbender!~walter@216.15.33.105> has joined #sugar-meeting
00:59 threeFifths <threeFifths!~threeFift@175.116.196.22> has joined #sugar-meeting
00:59 threeFifths Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
00:59 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
00:59 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
00:59 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
00:59 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
01:00 threeFifths has quit IRC
01:03 Auctus10 <Auctus10!~Auctus@110.77.242.58> has joined #sugar-meeting
01:03 Auctus10 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
01:03 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
01:03 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
01:03 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
01:03 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
01:03 Auctus10 has quit IRC
01:12 a-ritwik <a-ritwik!0e8bc409@gateway/web/freenode/ip.14.139.196.9> has joined #sugar-meeting
01:17 evil <evil!~evil@pc70140.amigo2.ne.jp> has joined #sugar-meeting
01:17 evil Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
01:17 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
01:18 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
01:18 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
01:18 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
01:18 evil has quit IRC
02:06 ynyounuo <ynyounuo!~ynyounuo@190-198-147-190.dyn.dsl.cantv.net> has joined #sugar-meeting
02:06 ynyounuo Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
02:06 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
02:06 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
02:06 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
02:06 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
02:07 ynyounuo has quit IRC
02:19 a-ritwik has quit IRC
02:23 pikurasa <pikurasa!~devin@209.6.193.250> has joined #sugar-meeting
02:23 walterbender has quit IRC
02:25 a-ritwik <a-ritwik!dfb3c6fe@gateway/web/freenode/ip.223.179.198.254> has joined #sugar-meeting
02:25 pikurasa hi a-ritwik
02:25 how are you?
02:26 a-ritwik pikurasa: hi, I am good.
02:26 pikurasa: How are you?
02:28 pikurasa a-ritwik: I am well
02:29 I have not yet tested your latest changes. Please allow me to fetch and test
02:32 What is the reason for the default pitch of Hz=392 in the widget's clamp?
02:32 What does changing the number do?
02:33 a-ritwik pikurasa: It does nothing, I think I should remove that.
02:33 pikurasa: I read your mail, I am working to resolve that.
02:34 pikurasa Perhaps a rhythm block to specify the rate at which the recording will occur... and maybe a tempo block, too... I don't know...
02:35 a-ritwik: it is not working for me (it did work before ~1.5 weeks ago). Would you mind sending me a video of a successful test from you?
02:36 a-ritwik pikurasa: I will send video.
02:37 pikurasa: There is a beats per minute block, will that work for our purpose?
02:37 pikurasa yes
02:37 and please send the video
02:37 I am really in the dark to what you are experiencing
02:38 a-ritwik pikurasa: Okay I will send video today.
02:39 pikurasa and what is the erase button (clear) suppose to do?
02:39 a-ritwik pikurasa: deletes all recorded audio till now.
02:41 pikurasa hmmm... like a "cancel" button
02:41 a-ritwik pikurasa: Can you see 'click to record' ?
02:41 pikurasa yes
02:41 a-ritwik pikurasa: yes
02:41 pikurasa and I try it
02:41 PolarizedIons18 <PolarizedIons18!~Polarized@89-64-24-115.dynamic.chello.pl> has joined #sugar-meeting
02:41 PolarizedIons18 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
02:41 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
02:41 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
02:41 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
02:41 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
02:42 a-ritwik pikurasa: Just click on start recording (mic icon).
02:42 pikurasa and then I sing into the mic, but the output shows only C8
02:42 PolarizedIons18 has quit IRC
02:43 pikurasa and pause does not seem to do anything
02:43 and pressing record again asks me again if I would like to grant permission to use microphone
02:44 a-ritwik pikurasa: Are you using computer's internal microphone or headset's microphone.
02:45 pikurasa Computer's microphone...
02:45 tries something
02:45 a-ritwik pikurasa: C8 is not changing means input from microphone is not coming.
02:45 riyalohia <riyalohia!1b3f7503@gateway/web/freenode/ip.27.63.117.3> has joined #sugar-meeting
02:46 pikurasa a-ritwik: I think there should be an error if that happens
02:46 or some message
02:46 a-ritwik +1
02:46 pikurasa C8 is deceptive if you do not know that it should mean that
02:46 a-ritwik pikurasa: I will add error message.
02:48 pikurasa Ok, I got it to work
02:48 The visual feedback seems slow to me
02:48 a-ritwik pikurasa: Are values shown changing now?
02:50 pikurasa Yes, I see them, but the reaction time seems slow
02:50 and the output is not accurate yet
02:51 riyalohia hi pikurasa
02:51 pikurasa For one, I have 2 for beats, but the output is in quarter notes.... The lower number is "beats", correct?
02:51 hi riyalohia
02:51 a-ritwik pikurasa: reaction time depends on values of bps and beats.
02:51 pikurasa the second issue seems to be octave -- is it taking into account octave?
02:52 a-ritwik pikurasa: means?
02:53 pikurasa hmmm...
02:53 a-ritwik pikurasa: It can show between C2 upto B8
02:53 pikurasa I tried singing two different times and got the exact same results.
02:54 notes to play: A♯5 1/4 logo.js:7507:33 notes to play: C4 1/4 logo.js:7507:33 notes to play: E4 1/4 logo.js:7507:33 notes to play: A♯3 1/4 logo.js:7507:33 notes to play: C4 1/4 logo.js:7507:33 notes to play: D♯4 1/4 logo.js:7507:33 notes to play: A♯3 1/4 logo.js:7507:33 notes to play: D5 1/4 logo.js:7507:33 notes to play: D♯4 1/4 logo.js:7507:33 notes to play: F4 1/4
02:54 The chances that I sing two different things and that the output is the same is pretty small.
02:54 What notes do you get when you try something?
02:55 a-ritwik pikurasa: did you click on clear, before recording again?
02:55 pikurasa: I think it had used previous data, instead of using new one.
02:56 pikurasa I think once a user saves, it should clear as well
02:56 I do not see why a user would want to keep the previous data
02:57 a-ritwik pikurasa: Okay, I will delete previous data on click of save.
02:58 pikurasa Please also give some visual feedback when the widget is recording. For example, the mic icon could turn red
02:58 a-ritwik pikurasa: +1
02:59 pikurasa: I will add that, is video still needed?
02:59 pikurasa Lastly, the user needs to hear what their tempo is. Is it possible to play clicks on the chosen beats while recording is live?
02:59 Otherwise the user is just guessing
03:00 a-ritwik: I would like the video. It would help me understand how you are using this widget. That being said, please keep it simple. No editing, just a quick sample.
03:01 a-ritwik pikurasa: That is a nice idea, It would help user, of course can be added.
03:01 pikurasa: Okay, will send today.
03:01 pikurasa And two clicks before recording starts would be nice as well.
03:02 So that there is some lead in
03:02 a-ritwik pikurasa: so recording starts after some delay?
03:02 pikurasa Other than that, please use your best judgement and ask yourself "is this something I would like to use?"
03:02 a-ritwik: yes. The clicks help orient a person's performance
03:03 It is very common in recording software
03:03 a-ritwik pikurasa: fine.
03:03 pikurasa *A few clicks before recording
03:03 a-ritwik: does that make sense?
03:04 a-ritwik pikurasa: yes, to prepare user to get ready for recording.
03:04 pikurasa yes
03:05 great. a-ritwik is there anything new I should test for software keyboard?
03:05 riyalohia: we will start shortly
03:05 riyalohia pikurasa, okay.
03:06 a-ritwik pikurasa: none, I will add giving input using hardware keyboard soon.
03:06 pikurasa a-ritwik: okay, great.
03:07 We are in the final stretch. Please implement these changes (and any major bug fixes) by the weekend, then stop and work and document/summarize
03:07 a-ritwik pikurasa: okay
03:08 pikurasa okay a-ritwik thanks for all the hard work. Talk to you soon!
03:08 a-ritwik pikurasa: thanks, bye.
03:08 pikurasa riyalohia: how are you?
03:08 a-ritwik has quit IRC
03:08 riyalohia pikurasa, I am fine :)
03:09 pikurasa, Can you please explain how invert block works?
03:09 pikurasa Say you have C D E, which are all up by a whole step
03:10 If you invert around the first C, then you get
03:10 C Bb Ab, which is all down by a whole step
03:10 I forget the details of even/odd, but those help you to get B A G, for example
03:11 by toggling even/odd
03:11 (I forget which is which, but could find out by testing quickly)
03:12 riyalohia: does that make sense?
03:12 riyalohia pikurasa, got it.
03:12 thank  you :)
03:13 pikurasa, I will fix these bugs asap.
03:13 Also, I wanted to know if I have to include anything else in final report?
03:16 pikurasa riyalohia: Perhaps some helpful info for anyone looking at your code. Things you learned as you did this, for example. Where to find your most interesting changes.
03:17 riyalohia pikurasa, okay.
03:17 I will add all these things.
03:18 pikurasa I have a question. Is temperament taking in account for key? I have not really tested this much.
03:19 We need a way to show the user what pitch is chosen for the temperament system
03:19 riyalohia pikurasa, No.
03:19 pikurasa Like Just Intonation `C`
03:19 Just Intonation `G`
03:19 etc
03:20 because the results are different depending on which pitch is chosen
03:20 riyalohia pikurasa, Can you give an example?
03:21 Ohh, you mean according to different starting pitch?
03:21 pikurasa Yes
03:21 riyalohia pikurasa, yes.
03:21 It works according to the key.
03:23 pikurasa Well, we need to signal to the user which starting pitch is being referred to for both the default and the custom temperaments
03:24 Otherwise the user is just guessing... It could either be by use of set key block or somewhere else
03:25 riyalohia Maybe we can put a warning which appears after pressing save button?
03:26 pikurasa I think there is a better way
03:26 tries
03:26 riyalohia okay.
03:28 pikurasa First of all, the widget should indicate the chosen key at all times
03:28 Right now, I can see it if I click the top note, 0, but it should always be visible
03:29 and I think it should go to the left of the name of the temperament system
03:30 riyalohia pikurasa, +1.
03:30 pikurasa The functionality for Just Intonation seems to be working as I change the keys, which is most likely all the hard work
03:30 the last step is to help the user benefit from all that hard work
03:31 riyalohia pikurasa, I agree.
03:31 pikurasa riyalohia: so if the user saves just intonation for D, for example, and they use the temperament block before a string of notes...
03:32 ...if they do not use "set key", then does it default to C???
03:32 or D???
03:33 riyalohia If set key is not used inside temperament widget, console gives error.
03:33 * inside temperament widget block.
03:33 pikurasa (small issue, but if the user tries to save a default temperament, either the save button should be grayed out or an error should be shown. I slightly prefer the former.)
03:34 riyalohia: I am talking about before a string of notes
03:34 not in the widget block
03:34 riyalohia pikurasa, I will implement that.
03:35 I guess it defaults to D.
03:36 pikurasa, what do you mean by string of notes here?
03:36 pikurasa What if it exports two blocks, the temperament block that it is already exporting plus the chosen starting pitch for "set key"???
03:36 string of notes = any notes (to create a melody, for example)
03:38 riyalohia pikurasa, Currently functionality of having multiple temperaments at a time is not implemented.
03:39 pikurasa has quit IRC
03:40 pikurasa <pikurasa!~devin@209.6.193.250> has joined #sugar-meeting
03:40 pikurasa riyalohia: I got kicked off
03:41 Please let me know what you said over the past ~2 min
03:41 sorry about that
03:41 riyalohia sure.
03:41 pikurasa, Currently functionality of having multiple temperaments at a time is not implemented.
03:41 pikurasa that is okay
03:42 riyalohia *multiple custom temperaments.
03:42 pikurasa multiple *performing* at a time?
03:42 riyalohia Yes.
03:43 pikurasa But multiple custom temperaments may be saved by user?
03:43 riyalohia pie menu of set temperament block can have 1 kind to custom temperament.
03:43 pikurasa riyalohia: is there a workaround to that?
03:44 riyalohia pikurasa, that is tricky.
03:45 pikurasa because of how pie menu works?
03:45 or because of how temperament works?
03:45 riyalohia Maybe I can work on all the bugs and other issues first, I will try to implement that after solving these bugs.
03:45 pikurasa, because of how temperament works.
03:46 pikurasa okay, well, if it is unsolvable in our current timeframe, please put a warning to mitigate user expectation
03:47 riyalohia pikurasa, sure!
03:47 If it is unsolvable in current timeframe, I will implement it after GSoC.
03:47 pikurasa what do you think about temperament block always coupled with set key block (as a macro), especially when saving custom temperament?
03:48 ...open to other solutions, but I would like to suggest to the user that set key has important implications for temperament.
03:49 riyalohia pikurasa, u mean the yellow temperament block?
03:50 pikurasa no, the green
03:51 riyalohia The widget temperament block already has set key block.
03:51 pikurasa I am talking about the single input "set temperament" block
03:51 when it is first introduced to the user, it is by itself
03:52 whether dragged from the palette or when the user saves a custom temperament
03:53 riyalohia I think it set key block can be embedded in yellow temperament block. That way, user can understand the importance of set key.
03:53 pikurasa if implemented that way, what would happen if the user changed it?
03:54 riyalohia pikurasa, what should be the expected result?
03:55 pikurasa here is my mode of thinking:
03:56 meantone, for example, takes into account sharps and flats as different pitches
03:56 so depending on key, the tuning is different
03:58 Also, the starting pitch (not necessarily the key) impacts just intonation.
03:58 (equal does not matter)
03:59 For Custom, the user may create a temperament with a particular starting pitch in mind, so it would be nice if that pitch carried over to their code
03:59 ...in some way.
03:59 Perhaps the solution is this:
04:00 1. a macro for "set temperament" which also has "set key"
04:01 to suggest that for meantone and just intonation and pythagorean, set key could change the reference point
04:01 2. change the default name of "custom" to also include the chosen starting pitch.
04:02 So that if the user started with C# major to create their temperament, the temperament would save as "C# custom"
04:03 (I can see that the yellow temperament specifies the starting pitch, but I want to make it a little more obvious, if possible)
04:03 does that make sense?
04:03 riyalohia So, when the saved temperament is custom, set temperament block will have set key attached to it. If pitch is changed from that set key block, then starting pitch will change?
04:04 pikurasa No.
04:04 I think my proposal is simpler than that.
04:04 riyalohia I am really sorry, I am not able to understand this.
04:05 pikurasa for #1, I am only talking about when you drag a "set temperament" from the (intervals) palette
04:05 for example, with note blocks we have macros that have both pitch and note value
04:06 when you drag out "set temperament" instead of just "set temperament" we should attach set key on top by default
04:07 riyalohia: does that make sense?
04:07 riyalohia what will be the difference in their fucntioning?
04:10 pikurasa I am running into some bugs with step block that is causing me trouble to test something that would help me explain this...
04:11 the change of key when generating the widget seems to work correctly.
04:11 Does that same functionality work when specifying different keys in your (visual) code?
04:12 for example, if a user chooses G major, then temperament = `just intonation` does it sound different than C major, then temperament = `just intonation`?
04:13 riyalohia Yes.
04:13 pikurasa (I would test this, but scalar step is not getting past a certain note)
04:13 riyalohia I will check.
04:13 pikurasa riyalohia: great, so I propose that when the user pulls "set temperament" from the interval palette it also has "set key" block attached to it
04:14 to suggest to the user that this functionality exists
04:14 (no change in functionality, really)
04:14 (just helping to guide the user)
04:14 does that make sense?
04:14 riyalohia Yes.
04:14 Got it.
04:14 pikurasa do you agree?
04:15 riyalohia Yes, I agree
04:15 pikurasa awesome, that was #1
04:15 #2 is, if possible, please name custom block with the pitch name for the chosen starting pitch
04:16 (when saved from temperament widget)
04:16 riyalohia okay.
04:17 pikurasa So the user will always (and conveniently) be reminded what starting pitch they chose.
04:17 riyalohia: do you agree?
04:17 riyalohia pikurasa, +1.
04:17 pikurasa and is it possible?
04:18 riyalohia Custom blocks are the one with set temperament blocks?
04:18 pikurasa pie menu
04:18 naming on pie menu
04:18 riyalohia pikurasa, yes. That is possible
04:19 pikurasa instead of "custom" say "D# custom" (if D# was the starting pitch)
04:19 great
04:19 riyalohia +1.
04:19 pikurasa also, please change the "custom note" to 1. be "custom pitch"
04:19 riyalohia Just one last question :p
04:20 pikurasa 2. when you pull it out instead of "pitch" say "custom pitch"
04:20 (I do not think the starting pitch needs to be in this name
04:20 )
04:21 riyalohia: does that naming make sense?
04:21 riyalohia set temperament block saved from widget should not have set key block but when it is pulled from palette, it should have set block attached to it?
04:22 pikurasa riyalohia: the only change I am proposing for (custom) set temperament block saved from widget is that the pie menu name should include the starting pitch in its name.
04:22 riyalohia pikurasa, okay.
04:24 pikurasa Because key does not necessarily have meaning for custom. And if it does, I do not think we are quite ready for that functionality yet as it has a cascade of implications.
04:24 riyalohia pikurasa, okay
04:25 pikurasa (like what are the keys for the new temperament system)
04:25 riyalohia: did you get the proposed change to naming the "custom note"?
04:25 riyalohia pikurasa, yes?
04:25 *yes.
04:26 pikurasa "custom note" would be (and this would be good to have anyway) a "custom pitch" block embedded in a note value block
04:26 having it would save time making it oneself
04:27 "note value custom pitch"
04:27 appearing in rhythm palette
04:27 riyalohia pikurasa, regarding naming #2, I have implemented all the functionality for pitch block. It would be difficult to change it from pitch to custom pitch.
04:28 pikurasa riyalohia: I see...
04:28 The current problem, as I see it, is that it is hard for a user to differentiate the custom pitch blocks from the default ones
04:29 especially since the starting pitch tends to be `C`
04:29 a quick fix would be to just give that `C` a more distinct name
04:30 `C (+/-0)`
04:30 riyalohia pikurasa, +1.
04:30 pikurasa which looks complicated, but solves the problem
04:30 riyalohia I will implement that.
04:31 pikurasa riyalohia: +1
04:31 thank you for your patience today (and throughout this week)
04:31 riyalohia pikurasa, thank you :)
04:32 pikurasa notes to play: F𝄪4 1/4
04:32 synthutils.js:324 WARNING: F𝄪4 not found
04:32 that is the error I get when using scalar step, btw
04:32 for just intonation
04:32 riyalohia Can you please send the test file?
04:32 pikurasa and key as c maj
04:33 riyalohia: ok
04:33 riyalohia thank you
04:36 pikurasa I just sent
04:36 I need to go now.
04:36 riyalohia okay.
04:37 pikurasa Bye and thanks again. Great work!!!
04:37 riyalohia bye
04:37 thank you :)
04:37 pikurasa has quit IRC
04:37 riyalohia has quit IRC
06:09 jercos16 <jercos16!~jercos@pda297f19.szoknt01.ap.so-net.ne.jp> has joined #sugar-meeting
06:09 jercos16 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
06:09 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
06:09 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
06:10 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
06:10 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
06:10 jercos16 has quit IRC
06:24 nkk71 <nkk71!~nkk71@i60-47-71-128.s41.a027.ap.plala.or.jp> has joined #sugar-meeting
06:24 nkk71 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
06:24 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
06:24 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
06:24 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
06:25 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
06:25 nkk71 has quit IRC
07:02 trobotham16 <trobotham16!~trobotham@183.104.99.140> has joined #sugar-meeting
07:02 trobotham16 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
07:02 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
07:02 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
07:02 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
07:02 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
07:03 trobotham16 has quit IRC
07:51 llaske <llaske!~llaske@host-185-104-27-104.ip.spadhausen.it> has joined #sugar-meeting
08:03 mist10 <mist10!~mist@43-197-102-121.flets.hi-ho.ne.jp> has joined #sugar-meeting
08:11 KleinerMann <KleinerMann!~KleinerMa@softbank060112019176.bbtec.net> has joined #sugar-meeting
08:11 KleinerMann Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
08:11 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
08:11 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
08:11 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
08:11 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
08:12 KleinerMann has quit IRC
08:18 node9 <node9!~node9@ALyon-256-1-114-32.w90-14.abo.wanadoo.fr> has joined #sugar-meeting
08:18 node9 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
08:19 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
08:19 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
08:19 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
08:19 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
08:20 node9 has quit IRC
08:23 y0sh29 <y0sh29!~y0sh@188.190.192.94> has joined #sugar-meeting
08:23 y0sh29 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
08:23 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
08:23 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
08:24 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
08:24 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
08:28 y0sh29 has quit IRC
08:33 Madbrad20019 <Madbrad20019!~Madbrad20@49.142.52.90> has joined #sugar-meeting
08:33 Madbrad20019 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
08:33 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
08:33 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
08:33 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
08:33 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
08:34 Madbrad20019 has quit IRC
08:36 khronosschoty28 <khronosschoty28!~khronossc@2.63.46.253> has joined #sugar-meeting
08:36 khronosschoty28 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
08:36 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
08:36 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
08:36 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
08:36 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
08:36 khronosschoty28 has quit IRC
08:41 llaske has quit IRC
11:07 meeting <meeting!~sugaroid@rev-18-85-44-69.sugarlabs.org> has joined #sugar-meeting
11:15 mlhess <mlhess!~mlhess@187.252.183.242> has joined #sugar-meeting
11:19 NSCLRP-1 <NSCLRP-1!~NSCLRP-1@169.net042124020.t-com.ne.jp> has joined #sugar-meeting
11:19 NSCLRP-1 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
11:19 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
11:19 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
11:19 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
11:19 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
11:20 NSCLRP-1 has quit IRC
11:39 vaibhavdaren <vaibhavdaren!~vaibhavda@180.151.89.190> has joined #sugar-meeting
11:39 vaibhavdaren is now known as Guest1434
11:41 Guest1434 has quit IRC
12:05 EvilWerezombie18 <EvilWerezombie18!~EvilWerez@148.101.66.76> has joined #sugar-meeting
12:05 EvilWerezombie18 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
12:05 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
12:05 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
12:05 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
12:05 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
12:05 EvilWerezombie18 has quit IRC
12:40 walterbender <walterbender!~walter@216.15.33.105> has joined #sugar-meeting
12:45 hook54321a <hook54321a!~hook54321@101.188.159.30> has joined #sugar-meeting
12:45 hook54321a Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
12:45 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
12:45 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
12:45 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
12:45 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
12:45 hook54321a is now known as Guest50887
12:46 Guest50887 has quit IRC
12:49 llaske <llaske!~llaske@host-185-104-27-104.ip.spadhausen.it> has joined #sugar-meeting
13:03 walterbender has quit IRC
13:10 llaske has quit IRC
13:28 stephen8720 <stephen8720!~stephen87@111.95.23.18> has joined #sugar-meeting
13:28 stephen8720 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
13:28 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
13:28 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
13:28 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
13:28 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
13:29 stephen8720 has quit IRC
13:31 llaske <llaske!~llaske@host-185-104-27-104.ip.spadhausen.it> has joined #sugar-meeting
13:36 llaske has quit IRC
13:49 walterbender <walterbender!~walter@65.216.148.162> has joined #sugar-meeting
13:52 llaske <llaske!~llaske@host-185-104-27-104.ip.spadhausen.it> has joined #sugar-meeting
13:57 llaske has quit IRC
13:57 walterbender has quit IRC
13:57 walterbender <walterbender!~walter@65.216.148.162> has joined #sugar-meeting
14:06 n-st7 <n-st7!~n-st@103.61.182.49> has joined #sugar-meeting
14:06 n-st7 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
14:06 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
14:06 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
14:06 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
14:06 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
14:11 n-st7 has quit IRC
14:31 theWhisper_ <theWhisper_!~theWhispe@41.238.226.76> has joined #sugar-meeting
14:31 theWhisper_ Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
14:31 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
14:31 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
14:31 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
14:31 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
14:32 theWhisper_ has quit IRC
14:33 llaske <llaske!~llaske@host-185-104-27-104.ip.spadhausen.it> has joined #sugar-meeting
14:37 llaske has quit IRC
14:38 Fieldy14 <Fieldy14!~Fieldy@180.183.246.173> has joined #sugar-meeting
14:38 Fieldy14 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
14:38 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
14:38 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
14:38 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
14:38 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
14:38 Fieldy14 has quit IRC
14:45 change <change!~change@host109-147-182-70.range109-147.btcentralplus.com> has joined #sugar-meeting
14:45 change Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
14:45 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
14:45 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
14:45 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
14:45 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
14:46 change has quit IRC
14:54 llaske <llaske!~llaske@host-185-104-27-104.ip.spadhausen.it> has joined #sugar-meeting
14:58 llaske has quit IRC
15:26 weaksauce0 <weaksauce0!~weaksauce@27.27.58.231> has joined #sugar-meeting
15:26 weaksauce0 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
15:26 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
15:26 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
15:26 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
15:26 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
15:26 weaksauce0 has quit IRC
15:29 L0S <L0S!~L0S@node-jh6.pool-125-27.dynamic.totbb.net> has joined #sugar-meeting
15:29 L0S Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
15:29 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
15:29 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
15:29 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
15:29 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
15:30 L0S has quit IRC
17:34 dfgg29 <dfgg29!~dfgg@i223-217-26-209.s42.a014.ap.plala.or.jp> has joined #sugar-meeting
17:34 dfgg29 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
17:34 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
17:34 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
17:34 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
17:34 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
17:35 dfgg29 has quit IRC
17:48 EvilWerezombie17 <EvilWerezombie17!~EvilWerez@59.22.86.51> has joined #sugar-meeting
17:48 EvilWerezombie17 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
17:48 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
17:49 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
17:49 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
17:49 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
17:49 EvilWerezombie17 has quit IRC
19:00 Evel-Knievel8 <Evel-Knievel8!~Evel-Knie@116.111.82.235> has joined #sugar-meeting
19:00 Evel-Knievel8 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
19:00 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
19:01 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
19:01 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
19:01 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
19:01 Evel-Knievel8 has quit IRC
19:11 totte <totte!~totte@178.57.2.190> has joined #sugar-meeting
19:11 totte Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
19:11 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
19:11 totte is now known as Guest66063
19:11 Guest66063 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
19:11 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
19:11 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
19:12 Guest66063 has quit IRC
19:14 Quokka25 <Quokka25!~Quokka@170.239.137.101> has joined #sugar-meeting
19:14 Quokka25 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
19:14 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
19:14 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
19:14 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
19:15 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
19:15 Quokka25 has quit IRC
20:03 enchi <enchi!~enchi@177.124.153.177> has joined #sugar-meeting
20:03 enchi Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
20:03 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
20:03 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
20:03 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
20:03 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
20:08 enchi has quit IRC
21:43 r3m14 <r3m14!~r3m@51.85-84-131.dynamic.clientes.euskaltel.es> has joined #sugar-meeting
21:43 r3m14 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
21:43 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
21:43 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
21:43 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
21:43 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
21:43 r3m14 has quit IRC
22:02 walterbender has quit IRC
22:05 tsglove22 <tsglove22!~tsglove@177.124.185.15.ondaagil.net.br> has joined #sugar-meeting
22:06 tsglove22 Christel just posted this "denial" on the freenode blog https://freenode.net/news/spam-shake Why does this blog post mention "10.2 million" THREE times?
22:06 This blog is essentially an ad for the Handshake ICO scam with a one-line "denial" of involvement mixed in there. It's obviously very unethical of Christel to not mention her own involvement in the scam which the blog post promotes.
22:06 Consider Andrew Lee's involvement, Andrew Lee is Christel's boss at London Trust Media and he also controls the majority of freenode voting rights. Andrew Lee also heads the handshake ICO scam. Coincidence?
22:06 Oh, and about those donations she speaks of: https://twitter.com/ISCdotORG/[…]25461692132519936
22:06 Don't support freenode and their ICO scam, switch to a network that hasn't been co-opted by corporate interests. OFTC or efnet might be a good choice. Perhaps even https://matrix.org/
22:06 tsglove22 has quit IRC
22:57 puzzola25 <puzzola25!~puzzola@pl33195.ag1212.nttpc.ne.jp> has joined #sugar-meeting
22:58 [scs]__ <[scs]__!scs@sunjammer.sugarlabs.org> has joined #sugar-meeting
22:58 puzzola25 has quit IRC
23:02 [scs]_ has quit IRC
23:02 Pro-Panda[m] has quit IRC

 « Previous day | Index | Today | Next day »     Channels | Search | Join

Powered by ilbot/Modified.
Webmaster