« Previous day | Index | Today | Next day » Channels | Search | Join
All times shown according to UTC.
Time | Nick | Message |
---|---|---|
06:13 | satellit has quit IRC | |
07:21 | ChristoferR <ChristoferR!~webchat![]() |
|
07:36 | ChristoferR has quit IRC | |
10:08 | mtd_ is now known as mtd | |
12:02 | gonzalo_odiard <gonzalo_odiard!~gonzalo![]() |
|
12:13 | meeting <meeting!~sugaroid![]() |
|
12:44 | sdanielf <sdanielf!~dfrancis@r186-49-34-69.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy> has joined #sugar-meeting | |
13:01 | walterbender <walterbender!~webchat![]() |
|
13:05 | Pablo__ <Pablo__!~webchat![]() |
|
13:16 | satellit <satellit!~Thomas![]() |
|
13:46 | JT4sugar <JT4sugar!~JT![]() |
|
14:00 | walterbender | hi CanoeBerry gonzalo_odiard cjl |
14:00 | still waiting for Claudia (Gerald will be late) and Daniel | |
14:02 | Pablo__ has quit IRC | |
14:03 | PabloBaques <PabloBaques!~webchat![]() |
|
14:04 | GeraldA <GeraldA!~quassel![]() |
|
14:05 | walterbender | hi GeraldA |
14:05 | GeraldA | Good morning, Walter. |
14:05 | walterbender | we have more than a quorum :) |
14:05 | GeraldA | great. |
14:05 | walterbender | we will get started in 1 minute |
14:06 | PabloBaques | ok. Hi everybody |
14:07 | walterbender | hi PabloBaques (still in the DR?) |
14:07 | let's get started | |
14:07 | #start-meeting | |
14:07 | meeting | Meeting started Mon Nov 4 14:07:29 2013 UTC. The chair is walterbender. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
14:07 | Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #endmeeting | |
14:07 | PabloBaques | yes.... ;-) |
14:07 | walterbender | Thanks everyone for coming today. |
14:07 | I think the new format of a regular meeting time will work well | |
14:08 | we've a quite a few agenda items to go through and then we can open the floor for additional items | |
14:08 | #topic election | |
14:09 | 3 seats are up for election: mine, Gerald's and Chris's | |
14:09 | Luke has agreed to run the election again and will be getting information out soon | |
14:09 | but what we need it to seek out some candidates | |
14:10 | any suggestions as to how to solicit candidates? | |
14:10 | GeraldA | what about Anna from Birmingham, who has done so much for that huge deployment? |
14:10 | I could reach out to her. | |
14:10 | walterbender | that's a nice idea |
14:10 | outofindia <outofindia!~webchat![]() |
|
14:11 | walterbender | she has seen the good, the bad and the ugly and would offer a lot |
14:11 | GeraldA | #agreed |
14:11 | walterbender | hi harriett |
14:11 | maybe outofindia ? | |
14:12 | outofindia | Hi Walter am I in the right channel for SLOB? |
14:12 | walterbender | she would give us perspective on India, a major market |
14:12 | outofindia: yes... we are just talking about recruiting candidates for the upcoming election :) | |
14:13 | outofindia | ok cool! |
14:13 | icarito | we will consult within the Peru community and try to have a representative from Peru |
14:13 | walterbender | icarito: +1... |
14:13 | claudia had suggested Jose Miguel from .UY | |
14:13 | if we all follow up, we'll have an interesting and competitive field | |
14:14 | GeraldA | when are the elections to be? |
14:14 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
14:15 | walterbender | GeraldA: prob. early December |
14:15 | any other thoughts/questions about the election? | |
14:15 | gonzalo_odiard | hi all |
14:15 | aneeshdogra | hi all! |
14:15 | kaametza | hi all! |
14:16 | CanoeBerry | hello |
14:16 | walterbender | hi gonzalo_odiard , et al... |
14:16 | sdanielf | hello! |
14:16 | icarito | hola todos :-) |
14:16 | walterbender | ah. Daniel is here. good |
14:16 | Ignacio <Ignacio!~webchat![]() |
|
14:17 | walterbender | shall we move to the next topic? |
14:17 | #topic ambassadors | |
14:17 | gonzalo_odiard: can you please give a little background on this? | |
14:17 | gonzalo_odiard | walterbender, yes |
14:18 | a topic we was thinking about, was how improve the communication between sugarlabs and the deployments | |
14:18 | to allow us to do a better planning, and fulfill the needs | |
14:19 | aklis <aklis!~aklis![]() |
|
14:20 | gonzalo_odiard | also have who promote the use of new sugar versions and other news we want communicate |
14:20 | Ignacio | Maybe a survey in start of sugar? |
14:20 | gonzalo_odiard | wait a little Ignacio |
14:20 | walterbender | It could be an individual or group within each region |
14:21 | gonzalo_odiard | looking at other ambassador programs, i would like we make clear the objectvies |
14:21 | walterbender | In some places we have something like this already, in an informal sense (harriett in India, Sebastian and Laura in Peru) |
14:21 | gonzalo_odiard | and make it a volunteer role, and with a specific time (one or two years) |
14:21 | walterbender | but yes, a more formal channel I think would be good |
14:22 | gonzalo_odiard | +1 |
14:23 | walterbender | how do others feel about this idea? |
14:23 | kaametza | there are also the case of many small scale deplyments like there are in Colombia |
14:23 | icarito | last time we tried to formalize anything outside USA, the SFC had an issue, but I guess if there is no funding involved they will be ok with it, except be careful about what "ambassador" means |
14:23 | gonzalo_odiard | kaametza, in that case would be good have a contact by deployment |
14:23 | walterbender | icarito: I think we can come up with language that won't cause issues for SFC |
14:23 | kaametza | gonzalo_odiard, +1 |
14:24 | walterbender | even in Peru, as kaametza and icarito pointed out on the devel list, there is lots of fragmentation |
14:24 | GeraldA | gonzalo_odiard, +1 |
14:25 | walterbender | be nice to be able to reach out to Puno and Chachapoyas... |
14:25 | outofindia | I am not sureabout having term limits as these are long term relationship development tasks...we should have a way of removing a dysfunctional ambassador but otherwise maybe have more people join the team as the deployments in the geo area grow. |
14:25 | gonzalo_odiard | then every ambassador would be connected to a location or deployment |
14:26 | walterbender | so, how to proceed? who will organize this? |
14:26 | kaametza | question is how to engage them |
14:26 | outofindia, +1 | |
14:27 | walterbender | Step 1 is to identify them. |
14:27 | Step 2 is to engage them. | |
14:27 | outofindia | +1 |
14:27 | gonzalo_odiard | outofindia, the issue i am trying to avoid setting a duration, is having people who is "on the papers" but not available anymore. if the ambassador is working, can be reelected |
14:27 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
14:28 | outofindia | gonzalo got it! |
14:28 | walterbender | maybe we can do this through appointments by SLOB in the first pass |
14:28 | gonzalo_odiard | walterbender, organize this can be a task of the slobs or we need a head of ambassadors? |
14:29 | walterbender | I think SLOBs should initiate the program, but the program should run itself |
14:29 | and we can appoint a SLOBs representative as a liaison | |
14:29 | icarito | frankly I don't see the point |
14:29 | walterbender | icarito: of ambassadors? |
14:29 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, can you explain? |
14:30 | icarito | hpachas was fedora ambassador for a long time |
14:30 | gonzalo_odiard | and? |
14:30 | icarito | i don't see what it is that you want to accomplish |
14:31 | and how giving people titiles will help | |
14:31 | walterbender | icarito: I see several needs |
14:31 | outofindia | Head of ambasssadors team needs to be one closest to the sugarlabs tech folk to be the bridge to translate and communicate |
14:31 | gonzalo_odiard | is not giving people titles only. we will do specific calls to them. like surveys or meetings |
14:31 | walterbender | icarito: for example, even in a deployment as mature as .UY I found that the teachers didn't even know about the Portfoiio activity |
14:32 | so there is definitely a communication break down | |
14:32 | icarito | yes but how making an ambassador will help, defeats me |
14:32 | walterbender | and I have seen that having a title is often useful for opening doors |
14:32 | but I agree, it doesn't solve the problem in and of itself | |
14:33 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, how you think sugarlabs can improve the communcation with deployments around 40 countries? |
14:33 | outofindia | icarito what alternative do you suggest as a bridge? |
14:33 | walterbender | as you pointed out, our efforts to create "local labs" ran into problems (many of our own making) |
14:33 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
14:33 | icarito | gonzalo_odiard, the sugar network of course - and about titles, that is one reason local people should sit in slobs |
14:33 | kaametza | having local labs used to serve all those purposes |
14:33 | icarito | with a title and a vote |
14:33 | sdanielf | More than titles... the important of an ambassador program is that Sugar Labs can feedback as directly as possible with deployments |
14:33 | walterbender | this might be a more workable solution |
14:34 | icarito: there are many more deployments than seats on SLOBs | |
14:34 | icarito | sdanielf, I see the need, but not the relation with ambassador programme |
14:35 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, while sugar-network can be a tool, i think the important part is the people. |
14:35 | kaametza | I may insist that the figure if the local labs serves everybody's needs |
14:35 | icarito | gonzalo_odiard, exactly |
14:35 | kaametza, +1 | |
14:35 | kaametza | *of |
14:36 | icarito | what I see being proposed here is isntead of having self-organized communities, have designated people |
14:36 | kaametza | it just needs the upstream support it deserves |
14:36 | gonzalo_odiard | then, out of the ambassadors idea, we agree in the need of better communication with the deployments, right? |
14:36 | walterbender | kaametza: I don't follow |
14:37 | icarito | i don't see how having top-down organization will help |
14:37 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, no, i don't agree |
14:37 | kaametza | walterbender, the local labs initative would benefit greatly of some upstream support |
14:37 | icarito | especially if there are no resources involved |
14:37 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, ambassador _are_ volunteers |
14:38 | walterbender | kaametza: I don't think upstream is opposed to supporting... it is a matter of communication, IMHO |
14:38 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, is not top down, is locate volunteers to help in the communication |
14:38 | icarito | gonzalo_odiard, so is somosazucar and ceibaljam, and more importantly, active contributors |
14:38 | kaametza | walterbender, yes communication is very important i.e. when recluting local translator the local lab should be aware |
14:38 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
14:38 | icarito | gonzalo_odiard, yes but it's being proposed to designate them from slobs |
14:38 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
14:39 | outofindia | its not top down..it is self organised but with designated persons who bridg the communcation gaps we have today...like walter 'portfolio' example. |
14:39 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, yes, because we need start in some way |
14:40 | walterbender | Let me see if I understand the issues |
14:40 | kaametza | outofindia, indeed the local lab can auto-organize |
14:40 | walterbender | (1) we agree we need better communication between upstream and deployments |
14:40 | icarito | gonzalo_odiard, when I say I don't see the point, I'm also saying we should not spend time on this |
14:40 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, and we have a responsability about sugalabs initiatives |
14:40 | kaametza | and name an embasator if needed |
14:40 | icarito | slobs should have more important things to discuss |
14:40 | walterbender | (2) we mostly agree that people are an essential part of better communication |
14:41 | icarito | sorry but duh |
14:41 | walterbender | (3) we seem to disagree about how to find/designate the people |
14:41 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
14:41 | outofindia | India had projects where people have put away the XOs because they do not know who to go for for problems and questions they have. |
14:41 | kaametza | outofindia, that's exactly the need for the existance of a local structure |
14:42 | not one person can resolve this | |
14:42 | walterbender | regarding #3, I don't see why we cannot have it both ways: let SLOBs appoint an initial team and also accept people nominated by local deployments |
14:42 | kaametza: this is not meant in any way to undermine local efforts | |
14:42 | I don't how you would come to that conclusion | |
14:42 | kaametza | walterbender, how can SLOBs have an idea of who should be on an "initial team" |
14:43 | walterbender | kaametza: by asking for input, like we are doing now |
14:43 | aneeshdogra_ has quit IRC | |
14:44 | kaametza | walterbender, ibasically when you reach out to the Amazon region located in Perú, we the local lab, were not communicated |
14:44 | gonzalo_odiard | a ambassadors program do not means reject local labs where they exists |
14:44 | walterbender | kaametza: I don't want to argue with you but that is not true |
14:44 | kaametza | so it is something that we want to avoid for the future |
14:45 | outofindia | answer to...how can SLOBs have an idea of who should be on an "initial team is because we are just looking to set up a communication channel from the Sugar source. |
14:45 | walterbender | kaametza: but at the same time, the "local lab" does not have a monopoly on communication |
14:45 | icarito | walterbender, no, we have an open mailing list |
14:45 | kaametza | walterbender, of course not |
14:45 | walterbender | outofindia: we have relationship with many people... reaching out to them seems a good place to start |
14:45 | kaametza | let's avoid by all means monopoly on communications! |
14:46 | icarito | and a blog, and a wiki |
14:46 | outofindia | kaametza, the people in the field are not on the lists and often cant be...and in our area do not have such free internet access. |
14:46 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
14:47 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, while is ok you think in your local situation, i think we need look globaly here |
14:47 | walterbender | we need to move on to some other topics. |
14:48 | we can come back to this again? | |
14:48 | GeraldA | +1 |
14:48 | outofindia | ok |
14:48 | kaametza | +1 |
14:48 | gonzalo_odiard | walterbender, no decision then? |
14:48 | walterbender | but I think we have consensus on the need to build a better channel to deployments |
14:48 | and we seem to have consensus on having ambassadors | |
14:49 | but a lack of consensus about how to designate them? | |
14:49 | gonzalo_odiard: would you like to make a motion we can vote on? | |
14:49 | outofindia | gonzalo after this...while I am in the USA would like to communicate with you offlin and see what we can do as a trial in communcation in india without any formal titles. |
14:49 | kaametza | there will be a need of definition of what an "ambassador" means |
14:50 | walterbender | thinks the compromise suggested earlier is adequate for our immediate needs |
14:50 | gonzalo_odiard | walterbender, i think we need decide how follow, by example: |
14:50 | -we need a better definition? | |
14:51 | icarito | for the record I think this is only slobs saying what other people should do instead of taking real action to change the status quo |
14:51 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, ok, you are clear. but we are trying to do something to change the situation |
14:52 | walterbender | gonzalo_odiard: let |
14:52 | gonzalo_odiard | i propose the following |
14:53 | i will circulate a proposal in the slobs mailing list, in the next meeting we can take a decision | |
14:53 | kaametza | in any case it sholud be deployments not slobs who need to define who their ämbassador" should be |
14:54 | gonzalo_odiard | kaametza, i think deployments can propose it |
14:54 | sdanielf | Maybe the Deployment Team can be part of this: http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Deployment_Team |
14:54 | walterbender | sdanielf: alas, the deployment team has been inactive |
14:55 | gonzalo_odiard | sdanielf, sadly, the deployment team is not working right now |
14:55 | walterbender | sdanielf: this is an attempt to breathe be life |
14:55 | kaametza | sdanielf, the deployment team need to get resurrected |
14:55 | walterbender | gonzalo_odiard: +1 to your proposal, except I think we can proceed by email w;/o waiting a month for a decision |
14:56 | kaametza | I myself volunteer for this but had no possitive response |
14:56 | walterbender | kaametza: not sure that "this" is |
14:56 | we need to move on | |
14:56 | outofindia | Am i wrong in thinking that... it isnt whose ambassadors the person is but rather an ambassador to cummincate about Sugar to all |
14:56 | sdanielf | well, but before the SLOBs discuss about getting embassadors to deployments, we can get interested people to the deployment team |
14:57 | kaametza | walterbender, this = volunteer for activating the Deployment Team ( Isent you a request by email that never got a response) |
14:57 | walterbender | sdanielf: I see this is a way to create a new deployment team... it is bit more than rearranging chairs though... |
14:57 | kaametza: I'll look in my email... | |
14:58 | kaametza | :O) |
14:58 | still interested! | |
14:58 | walterbender | well, maybe you can help shape the current proposal, which is the only one on the table as far as I know |
14:59 | it is a tangible, actionable proposal which gonzalo_odiard will formalize | |
14:59 | kaametza | walterbender, great maybe sdanielf can help me? |
14:59 | walterbender | ok... next topic |
14:59 | #topic tech/learning meetups | |
15:00 | since Claudia is not here and we are short on time, I would like to defer this topic to the next meeting | |
15:00 | #topic trip advisor grant | |
15:01 | icarito | gonzalo_odiard, it would be better to discuss on iaep@ unless it needs to be private |
15:01 | walterbender | I had not made it public yet because the paperwork had not been finalized, but we got a grant from trip advisor for supporting Turtle Art Day activities and i18n efforts |
15:02 | I am working with Sean on PR | |
15:02 | kaametza | icarito, +1 |
15:02 | walterbender | but what I'd like to clarify today with SLOBs is administration of the grant |
15:03 | I'd like to streamline the process of getting translators on board | |
15:03 | and would like to defer in this case to cjl and the i18n team to manage that aspect of the grant | |
15:04 | he and I discussed the short term priorities and they were spelled out in the grant proposal | |
15:04 | gonzalo_odiard | +1 to cjl command that |
15:04 | walterbender | so as long as he is adhering to those priorities, I think we (SLOBs) can step back |
15:04 | CanoeBerry | great thanks to cjl's work organizing haitian creole translation over the past 3.5 months, can we clarify rough next steps around this Trip Advisor grant? |
15:04 | walterbender | CanoeBerry: exactly... |
15:05 | now that the money is here, I'd like to streamline the process of allocating it | |
15:05 | and free up our experts to do their work | |
15:06 | CanoeBerry | great |
15:06 | walterbender | so I guess I would like to make a motion: |
15:08 | #motion allocate the trip advisor funds (up to 18K) to cjl's efforts in hatian creole, guarani, maori, quechua, and the efforts to get glibc updates upstream | |
15:08 | and he can get back to us if the shortterm needs change | |
15:09 | gonzalo_odiard | walterbender, +1 |
15:09 | GeraldA | walterbender +1 |
15:09 | CanoeBerry | +1, some of which might have been spelled out in the grant itself i understand (eg. haitian creole if i understand cjl correctly?) |
15:09 | gonzalo_odiard | walterbender, i think cjl should receive a pay for his work |
15:09 | walterbender | CanoeBerry: yes... all of this was spelled out in the grant |
15:09 | +1 | |
15:09 | CanoeBerry | gotit |
15:10 | +1 to cjl received a portion for his work | |
15:10 | walterbender | gonzalo_odiard: the glibc work is something we are contracting to him |
15:10 | CanoeBerry | +1 to cjl receivING a portion for his work |
15:10 | walterbender | motion passes |
15:10 | gonzalo_odiard | walterbender, ok |
15:11 | PabloBaques | I am currently in DR... nextdoor to Hait... what is a way to reach cjl? |
15:11 | *Haiti | |
15:11 | Is cjl in Haiti? | |
15:12 | walterbender | cjl![]() |
15:12 | gonzalo_odiard | PabloBaques, cjl is not Haiti |
15:12 | PabloBaques | tx Walter. |
15:12 | walterbender | PabloBaques: CanoeBerry may be a better contact for Haiti |
15:12 | CanoeBerry | clarif: is this $18K intended to be spent within 1 year of receipt of the funds and/or roughly when? |
15:13 | walterbender | CanoeBerry: yes... we have 3 years at 40K per year... half for i18n and half for Turtle Art Day |
15:13 | CanoeBerry | ok |
15:13 | walterbender | CanoeBerry: if the i18n work goes well this year, I may ask for more $ for next year |
15:14 | we are short on time. I'd like to bring up two more topics quickly | |
15:14 | #topic Google Code In | |
15:14 | As you know, we are accepted for Google Code In again this year. | |
15:14 | Ignacio | :) |
15:15 | walterbender | We have a decent list of initial projects... |
15:15 | it was nice to see icarito and kaametza adding projects over the weekend | |
15:15 | but we need more mentors | |
15:15 | and we need to reach out to deployments to solicit participation | |
15:15 | tincho has reached out to .PY | |
15:16 | and we have good reach into .UY | |
15:16 | but we need more | |
15:16 | this would be a great job for ambassadors :) | |
15:16 | GeraldA | I was just thinking this |
15:16 | walterbender | so please, everyone, encourage people to sign up as mentors and get the word out |
15:17 | icarito | kaametza, reached out to the local community already thru the somosazucar list |
15:17 | maybe you didn't see it | |
15:18 | walterbender | I've been trying to spread the word through social media too. |
15:18 | next topic... | |
15:18 | #topic PR | |
15:19 | As gonzalo_odiard pointed out, we should get some PR out about Sugar 100 | |
15:19 | I already have sean working on PR for the trip advisor grant and GCI | |
15:19 | three quick announcements in a row I think would be very nice | |
15:20 | alas, the turtle art day press release didn't seem to get picked up very broadly :( | |
15:20 | if there are other topics we should be making noise about, please contact the marketing team | |
15:21 | any other topics people want to discuss? | |
15:21 | outofindia | are the old press releases to be found in any one place? |
15:21 | walterbender | outofindia: yes |
15:22 | looks for the URL | |
15:22 | enterprise_user <enterprise_user!~ignacio![]() |
|
15:22 | walterbender | http://www.sugarlabs.org/index.php?template=press |
15:22 | gonzalo_odiard | walterbender, who is in the marketing team? |
15:22 | icarito | only about transparency and private-public communications, I would like slobs to reaffirm that only topics that need to be private will be dealt with in private, as is our policy |
15:23 | walterbender | gonzalo_odiard: sean and me seem to be the active ones |
15:23 | enterprise_user is now known as Ignacio_ | |
15:24 | walterbender | icarito: the only private discussion we have had in at least 1 year was the trip advisor grant |
15:24 | icarito: and that was because we needed to keep it private during the TA deliberations | |
15:24 | icarito | i'm only saying because gonzalo_odiard propsed to discuss ambassador program on slobs list |
15:24 | walterbender | icarito: and publicly |
15:25 | and it was in my blog and the digest and in the public agenda for this meeting | |
15:25 | so your point is? | |
15:25 | icarito | ambassador program need not be private |
15:25 | and it gives a bad feeling that such a thing wuold be private | |
15:25 | walterbender | I think we are all in agreement |
15:25 | Ignacio_ has left #sugar-meeting | |
15:26 | walterbender | so it has been public from the get go... |
15:26 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, i think have sense discuss by example the terms of the ambassador definition before we take a final decision |
15:26 | icarito | gonzalo_odiard, yes absolutely, but in public |
15:26 | walterbender | icarito: all of the discussion to date has been public... I don't see why we would want to change that |
15:27 | gonzalo_odiard | icarito, if was not public, you would not be here .9 |
15:27 | walterbender | anyway, we should wrap up |
15:27 | thanks all for contrinbuting | |
15:27 | icarito | ok looking forward to the discusson on IAEP then |
15:27 | walterbender | please send agenda items for the next meeting (2 December) to the lists |
15:28 | gonzalo_odiard will follow up re the ambassador program | |
15:28 | gonzalo_odiard | yes |
15:28 | walterbender | and please solicit mentors and tasks and participants for GCI |
15:28 | 6 | |
15:28 | outofindia | Thanks...bye. |
15:29 | gonzalo_odiard | 5 |
15:29 | GeraldA | Thanks, |
15:29 | 4 | |
15:29 | sdanielf | 3 |
15:29 | kaametza | have a good day everyone! |
15:29 | Ignacio | 2 |
15:29 | sdanielf | bye! |
15:29 | icarito | good day all |
15:29 | GeraldA | #exit |
15:29 | Ignacio | Bye :) |
15:29 | GeraldA has quit IRC | |
15:29 | walterbender | #end-meeting |
15:29 | meeting | Meeting ended Mon Nov 4 15:29:43 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. (v 0.1.4) |
15:29 | Minutes: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/s[…]-04T14:07:29.html | |
15:29 | Log: http://meeting.sugarlabs.org/s[…]13-11-04T14:07:29 | |
15:29 | CanoeBerry | Thanks All |
15:30 | outofindia has quit IRC | |
15:41 | ChristoferR <ChristoferR!~webchat![]() |
|
16:08 | Ignacio has quit IRC | |
17:01 | cjl | sorry for being afk during meeting. |
17:02 | PabloBaques: CanoeBerry is our Haiti expert, I am the Translation Team Corodinator | |
17:04 | sdanielf has quit IRC | |
17:04 | sdanielf <sdanielf!~dfrancis@r186-49-47-191.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy> has joined #sugar-meeting | |
17:51 | JT4sugar has quit IRC | |
18:04 | satellit has quit IRC | |
18:07 | sdanielf has quit IRC | |
18:13 | satellit <satellit!~Thomas![]() |
|
18:25 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
18:28 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
18:28 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
18:40 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
18:41 | satellit has quit IRC | |
18:42 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
18:42 | aneeshdogra_ is now known as aneeshdogra | |
18:43 | satellit <satellit!~Thomas![]() |
|
18:45 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
18:47 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
18:49 | aneeshdogra_ has quit IRC | |
18:52 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
18:57 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
18:58 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
19:04 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
19:07 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
19:11 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
19:16 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
19:13 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
19:14 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
19:15 | PabloBaques has quit IRC | |
19:15 | walterbender has quit IRC | |
19:16 | meeting has quit IRC | |
19:16 | meeting <meeting!~sugaroid![]() |
|
19:17 | aneeshdogra_ has quit IRC | |
19:22 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
19:28 | JT4sugar <JT4sugar!~JT![]() |
|
19:34 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
19:36 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
19:36 | aneeshdogra_ is now known as aneeshdogra | |
19:42 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
19:44 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
19:46 | aneeshdogra_ is now known as aneeshdogra | |
19:52 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
20:01 | ChristoferR has quit IRC | |
20:03 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
20:15 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
20:19 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
20:24 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
20:26 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
20:27 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
20:29 | aneeshdogra_ has quit IRC | |
20:33 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
20:35 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
20:35 | aneeshdogra_ is now known as aneeshdogra | |
20:39 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
20:40 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
20:40 | aneeshdogra_ is now known as aneeshdogra | |
20:45 | gonzalo_odiard has quit IRC | |
20:50 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
20:51 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
20:55 | aneeshdogra_ has quit IRC | |
20:55 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
21:03 | aneeshdogra_ <aneeshdogra_!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
21:03 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
21:03 | aneeshdogra_ is now known as aneeshdogra | |
21:19 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
21:20 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
21:26 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
21:31 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
21:40 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
21:50 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
21:55 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
22:10 | CanoeBerry has quit IRC | |
22:11 | CanoeBerry <CanoeBerry!~CanoeBerr![]() |
|
22:22 | aneeshdogra <aneeshdogra!~aneeshdog![]() |
|
22:23 | aneeshdogra has quit IRC | |
22:30 | CanoeBerry has quit IRC | |
22:30 | CanoeBerry <CanoeBerry!~CanoeBerr![]() |
|
23:22 | satellit_e has quit IRC |
« Previous day | Index | Today | Next day » Channels | Search | Join