« Previous day | Index | Today | Next day » Channels | Search | Join
All times shown according to UTC.
| Time | Nick | Message |
|---|---|---|
| 00:16 | lucian has quit IRC | |
| 00:37 | m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk | |
| 01:07 | dfarning_afk is now known as dfarning | |
| 01:24 | m_anish_afk is now known as m_anish | |
| 02:56 | dogi has quit IRC | |
| 06:31 | yama` <yama`!~yama 124-149-118-161.dyn.iinet.net.au> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 06:31 | yama` has quit IRC | |
| 06:31 | yama` <yama`!~yamaubuntu/member/yama> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 06:33 | yama has quit IRC | |
| 06:41 | yevlempy <yevlempy!~yevlempy115.117.217.172> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 08:12 | yevlempy has quit IRC | |
| 09:11 | dfarning is now known as dfarning_afk | |
| 09:55 | lucian_ <lucian_!~lucian78-86-217-168.zone2.bethere.co.uk> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 11:20 | lucian_ is now known as lucian | |
| 12:05 | silbe <silbe!~silbetwin.sascha.silbe.org> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 13:00 | silbe has quit IRC | |
| 13:07 | silbe <silbe!~silbetwin.sascha.silbe.org> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 13:32 | dogi <dogi!~nemoc-65-96-166-32.hsd1.ma.comcast.net> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 13:39 | tch <tch!~tch190.52.135.80> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 13:51 | dogi has quit IRC | |
| 14:06 | m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk | |
| 14:07 | cjb has quit IRC | |
| 14:16 | cjb <cjb!~cjbpullcord.laptop.org> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 14:32 | meeting | * walterbender-es has joined |
| 15:21 | satellit_ is now known as satellit_afk | |
| 15:57 | meeting | * walterbender has quit (Ping timeout: 240 seconds) |
| 16:09 | m_anish_afk is now known as m_anish | |
| 16:51 | dirakx has quit IRC | |
| 16:52 | m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk | |
| 16:54 | m_anish_afk is now known as m_anish | |
| 17:00 | lucian has quit IRC | |
| 17:00 | cjb | sug |
| 17:00 | oops | |
| 17:05 | dirakx <dirakx!rafael190.156.115.38> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 17:05 | lucian <lucian!~lucian78-86-217-168.zone2.bethere.co.uk> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 17:07 | icarito <icarito!~icaro190.143.82.133> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 17:38 | ClaudiaU has quit IRC | |
| 18:15 | lucian has quit IRC | |
| 18:36 | icarito has quit IRC | |
| 18:50 | icarito <icarito!~icaro190.143.81.248> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 19:25 | icarito has quit IRC | |
| 19:39 | icarito <icarito!~icaro190.143.81.174> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 19:40 | dcorking <dcorking!~dcorking91.85.172.244> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 19:50 | m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk | |
| 19:54 | mchua_afk is now known as mchua | |
| 19:55 | lucian <lucian!~lucian78-86-217-168.zone2.bethere.co.uk> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 19:56 | icarito has quit IRC | |
| 19:57 | SeanDaly <SeanDaly!~chatzilla80.214.1.21> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 19:57 | SeanDaly has quit IRC | |
| 20:06 | dcorking has quit IRC | |
| 20:08 | icarito <icarito!~icaro190.143.81.56> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 20:40 | FranXOphonie <FranXOphonie!~FranXOpho132.203.8.53> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 20:41 | mchua is now known as mchua_afk | |
| 20:42 | m_anish_afk is now known as m_anish | |
| 21:01 | yama <yama!~yama124-168-55-170.dyn.iinet.net.au> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 21:01 | yama has quit IRC | |
| 21:01 | yama <yama!~yamaubuntu/member/yama> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 21:01 | meeting | * pflores-es has joined |
| 21:02 | pflores <pflores!~pflores@r186-48-3-185.dialup.adsl.anteldata.net.uy> has joined #sugar-meeting | |
| 21:03 | yama` has quit IRC | |
| 21:06 | meeting | * geirea-es has joined |
| 21:11 | <geirea-es> we are the ones? | |
| 21:11 | geirea <geirea!a449200bgateway/web/freenode/ip.164.73.32.11> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 21:13 | meeting | <pflores-es> that rare godiard |
| 21:15 | <geirea-es> It was not clear whether it was at 18 or 19 | |
| 21:16 | <pflores-es> warns you that is connected gmail | |
| 21:16 | <pflores-es> but answered an n | |
| 21:16 | <pflores-es> Walter told me that no pruning | |
| 21:16 | <pflores-es> Fernando and I send SMS now | |
| 21:16 | * gonzalo-es has joined | |
| 21:17 | <gonzalo-es> hello! | |
| 21:17 | <pflores-es> hi! | |
| 21:18 | <pflores-es> aa: TAS? | |
| 21:19 | dirakx | where is this meeting hapening ? ;) |
| 21:19 | meeting | <pflores-es> geirea, godiard: Well, we start between us? |
| 21:19 | * FernandoSansberr-es has joined | |
| 21:20 | pflores | #sugar-meeting-es |
| 21:20 | ditakx: ^ | |
| 21:21 | meeting | <pflores-es> godiard: Not much to take in clean answers about the program sent the lists, right? |
| 21:21 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: ^ | |
| 21:22 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: begin the reunion? | |
| 21:22 | <FernandoSansberr-es> hello | |
| 21:22 | <pflores-es> hello | |
| 21:22 | <geirea-es> hello | |
| 21:22 | <pflores-es> I say start, if | |
| 21:22 | <gonzalo-es> ok, hello everyone! | |
| 21:23 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: responding to your question, there is little | |
| 21:23 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: Rosamel can give a talk of integration into the curriculum, but I have to confirm | |
| 21:24 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: if, spoke with me | |
| 21:24 | <gonzalo-es> I'm beginning to think that we can be the strategy blunders | |
| 21:24 | <pflores-es> est good proposal to chat | |
| 21:24 | <pflores-es> a vision from the educational needs SW | |
| 21:24 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: for? | |
| 21:25 | <gonzalo-es> instead of defining the issues and look for people who give the talks, perhaps we need to make a call to give talks and proposed that people want to talk | |
| 21:25 | <gonzalo-es> set a deadline, etc. | |
| 21:26 | <pflores-es> I liked but I'm not sure that we achieve a greater response ... : ( | |
| 21:26 | <geirea-es> that is the usual mechanism, the problem is that we do not have much time | |
| 21:26 | <gonzalo-es> overcomes any ideas? | |
| 21:26 | <pflores-es> the most effective way I can think of is to contact directly to those coming estn | |
| 21:26 | <pflores-es> talk to them one by one | |
| 21:27 | <geirea-es> I agree, is much more work | |
| 21:27 | <pflores-es> macro to see which program they would like to ... | |
| 21:27 | <aa-es> hello | |
| 21:27 | <pflores-es> aa: hi! | |
| 21:27 | <geirea-es> hello | |
| 21:27 | <gonzalo-es> hello aa | |
| 21:28 | <pflores-es> geirea: is that at this point I doubt that works as anything but | |
| 21:28 | <pflores-es> 1 to 1 .. | |
| 21:28 | <gonzalo-es> ok, then we can move on we have to clean today? Etherpad? | |
| 21:28 | <geirea-es> I have a listed proposals: creatic (accessibility), werner (experience in Chile) and Rodolfo Maple | |
| 21:29 | <pflores-es> ok, I have what Rosamel ... | |
| 21:29 | <geirea-es> http://openetherpad.org/jbLB7nGaz6 | |
| 21:29 | <geirea-es> messy is half the poor pad | |
| 21:30 | mchua_afk is now known as mchua | |
| 21:30 | meeting | <gonzalo-es> You can clear all colors |
| 21:31 | <gonzalo-es> see everything in black now? | |
| 21:31 | <geirea-es> remember: Friday morning and 6 round table talks | |
| 21:31 | <geirea-es> Friday afternoon: track and track basic sugar summit | |
| 21:31 | <geirea-es> Saturday morning: deployments | |
| 21:31 | <geirea-es> Saturday afternoon: unconference | |
| 21:31 | <pflores-es> One possibility is to keep throwing ideas about the program as last week And after throwing proposals that we know are | |
| 21:32 | <pflores-es> also be responsive to people who are going to pull their proposed signing ... | |
| 21:32 | <gonzalo-es> I seem to write down a list of what is already volunteers responsible? | |
| 21:33 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: Best as all white:) | |
| 21:33 | <geirea-es> we assume that the sugar summit track manages itself? | |
| 21:33 | <aa-es> geirea: I think it will be the best | |
| 21:33 | <pflores-es> geirea: or at least we can manage most of the time ... | |
| 21:33 | <gonzalo-es> geirea: if | |
| 21:33 | <geirea-es> well | |
| 21:34 | <geirea-es> then we can narrow the problem to the following: 1) talks Friday morning, 2) basic track sugar and 3) discussions / exchange of deployments | |
| 21:34 | <geirea-es> to 1) have some good candidates | |
| 21:34 | <geirea-es> for 2) we need a volunteer | |
| 21:34 | <geirea-es> for 3) we need to contact the deployments | |
| 21:35 | <pflores-es> for 2) Philip proponaa trojanchicken | |
| 21:35 | <geirea-es> Philip may be fine but we would like someone to talk about gtk | |
| 21:35 | <geirea-es> because they did everything in pygame trojanchicken | |
| 21:36 | <pflores-es> ok .... any ideas? | |
| 21:36 | <geirea-es> (Someone other than Felipe say) | |
| 21:36 | <aa-es> would be nice if someone mentions a technical overview of sugar rather than gtk | |
| 21:36 | <pflores-es> aa: +1 | |
| 21:36 | <geirea-es> the problem is that someone is going to miss the summit | |
| 21:36 | <aa-es> The basic track is sugar in 2 tracks? | |
| 21:36 | <aa-es> pun intended ... | |
| 21:37 | <geirea-es> aa: no, it's 1 track | |
| 21:37 | <geirea-es> the other track is the pinnacle | |
| 21:38 | <geirea-es> I imagine the basic track overview of sugar type, how to do an activity, and gtk basic basic pygame | |
| 21:38 | <aa-es> ok, there are 5 lectures then? | |
| 21:38 | <aa-es> Friday we're talking 14 to 19 do not? | |
| 21:38 | <gonzalo-es> one would be "mi primera actividad"? | |
| 21:39 | <pflores-es> aa: so there is a brainstorm of things that may go on top | |
| 21:40 | <geirea-es> aa: yes | |
| 21:40 | icarito has quit IRC | |
| 21:41 | meeting | <aa-es> I think that what is on the okay Etherpad |
| 21:41 | <aa-es> - Description of Sugar | |
| 21:41 | <aa-es> - How to do an activity | |
| 21:41 | <aa-es> - Development with PyGTK | |
| 21:41 | <aa-es> - Development with PyGame | |
| 21:41 | <geirea-es> Felipe da suppose it Pygame, who gives the other? | |
| 21:41 | <aa-es> would be nice to have a party responsible for organizing this | |
| 21:42 | <pflores-es> all begs the question: quin | |
| 21:42 | <aa-es> one of the guests have a good Spanish? | |
| 21:43 | <aa-es> would be great if the did the first part walter | |
| 21:43 | <pflores-es> will have to be someone not too keen on the top sugar | |
| 21:43 | <aa-es> clear | |
| 21:43 | <aa-es> Flavio? | |
| 21:43 | <gonzalo-es> is a difficult combination:) | |
| 21:44 | <geirea-es> Flavio can ask, yes | |
| 21:44 | <aa-es> could stagger so that everyone can be for the overview of sugar | |
| 21:44 | <geirea-es> I do not know if he dominates the architecture of sugar | |
| 21:45 | <aa-es> geirea: I think to give an overview yes | |
| 21:45 | <aa-es> in 45 minutes you can not go into much detail | |
| 21:45 | <pflores-es> Flavio sounds great | |
| 21:45 | <aa-es> I like flavio for the second and third part | |
| 21:45 | <pflores-es> if it is as effective as with her students:) | |
| 21:45 | <aa-es> and / or | |
| 21:46 | <geirea-es> is true that the focus will be to develop an activity, then the architecture of sugar does not matter | |
| 21:46 | * gonzalo has quit (Quit: Ex-Chat) | |
| 21:47 | <aa-es> Paul Moleri? | |
| 21:47 | <pflores-es> To see which you think as I put it in Etherpad? | |
| 21:47 | * gonzalo-es has joined | |
| 21:47 | <aa-es> hmm, felipe is so deep as to talk in the overview? | |
| 21:47 | <geirea-es> pflores: 3 and 4 would change | |
| 21:47 | <pflores-es> pmoleri perhaps all that may help track | |
| 21:48 | gonzalo <gonzalo!~gonzalo190.173.13.168> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 21:48 | meeting | <pflores-es> geirea: true |
| 21:48 | <aa-es> I guess I like the first lecture topics are: - History of sugar (10 min), - Principles of HIG (20 min) - Implementation Overview (20 min) | |
| 21:48 | <pflores-es> seems like a good combination if Flavio, Philip and Paul join forces for this track will be great | |
| 21:49 | <gonzalo-es> aa: but an introduction and make the Friday morning | |
| 21:50 | <aa-es> gonzalo: but not to that level, I think | |
| 21:50 | <pflores-es> aa: I like it, but fifth of those who do not are participating in the summit may give it sugar? | |
| 21:51 | <gonzalo-es> aa: perhaps for the tar5de what is more important how to build your development environment | |
| 21:51 | <aa-es> pflores: anyone who reads a little wiki can talk 20 minutes from the HIG | |
| 21:51 | <aa-es> gonzalo: yes, that insurance must be in one of those talks | |
| 21:52 | <pflores-es> They seem to propose to Flavio, Philip and Paul, if you can order? | |
| 21:52 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: yes, who can be charged? | |
| 21:52 | <aa-es> +1 | |
| 21:52 | <geirea-es> pflores: well, then we propongámoslo | |
| 21:53 | <gonzalo-es> geirea: put a charge of communicating with them | |
| 21:53 | <geirea-es> I am writing | |
| 21:53 | icarito <icarito!~icaro190.143.81.118> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 21:53 | meeting | <gonzalo-es> ok:) |
| 21:53 | <pflores-es> ok, great | |
| 21:53 | <geirea-es> someone has felipe mail? | |
| 21:55 | <aa-es> geirea: I was in a mail ... | |
| 21:55 | <aa-es> geirea: Felipe Otamendi | |
| 21:55 | <geirea-es> thanks! | |
| 21:55 | <aa-es> np | |
| 21:56 | <pflores-es> Les seems to happen to Saturday from morning? | |
| 21:56 | <aa-es> ok, let the sugar summit? | |
| 21:56 | <aa-es> ok | |
| 21:56 | <aa-es> I believe that the summit would have to build a sugar in sugar-devel thread | |
| 21:57 | <pflores-es> aa: +1 | |
| 21:57 | <gonzalo-es> Rosamel chat should be in the morning | |
| 21:57 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: I'm not sure | |
| 21:57 | <aa-es> saying that the purpose of the thread is put together a schedule for that period of time | |
| 21:57 | <aa-es> I send the mail | |
| 21:57 | <pflores-es> aa: +1 | |
| 21:57 | <gonzalo-es> aa: ok, hope you have better luck than me .... | |
| 21:58 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: why? | |
| 21:58 | <aa-es> gonzalo: someone answered? | |
| 21:58 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: I was thinking on Saturday in the afternoon is a good time to invite more open to teachers, something more of the style of what we Caryl | |
| 21:59 | <gonzalo-es> aa: almost no response | |
| 21:59 | <aa-es> gonzalo: ok, try back then | |
| 21:59 | <pflores-es> anyway chat Rosamel perhaps be more oriented towards developers that teachers | |
| 21:59 | <pflores-es> so I say I'm not sure:) | |
| 21:59 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: I think teachers will you have to take a more structured framework (talks / discussions, but with time) | |
| 22:00 | <aa-es> gonzalo: +1 | |
| 22:00 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: +1 | |
| 22:00 | <aa-es> and certified! : P | |
| 22:00 | <pflores-es> that deca is that in any case that we do on Saturday afternoon | |
| 22:01 | <pflores-es> What I said Rosamel is to give a talk with Jose Barrios, who is inspector and worked in Ceibal / ANEP for 2 years | |
| 22:01 | <pflores-es> on the most important needs in the XO from the point of view SW | |
| 22:02 | <aa-es> great | |
| 22:02 | <pflores-es> Maybe we can make a panel of teachers for that | |
| 22:02 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: but that does not fall within the experiences of deployments? | |
| 22:02 | <aa-es> is a talk for power-users than developers can | |
| 22:02 | <pflores-es> aa: how? | |
| 22:02 | <aa-es> I think at this event, when we talk about teachers should be power-teachers: P | |
| 22:02 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: Yes, you can be | |
| 22:02 | <pflores-es> haha | |
| 22:03 | <gonzalo-es> haha, a new term power-teachers! | |
| 22:03 | <aa-es> pflores: that is, teachers who are interested in exploring the subject and have some idea of ??the thing and | |
| 22:03 | <gonzalo-es> certificate that can be said:) | |
| 22:03 | <aa-es> haha | |
| 22:03 | <pflores-es> haha | |
| 22:03 | <pflores-es> Let's see, about the experience of deployments, we have: | |
| 22:03 | <gonzalo-es> Teachers will also pay 100 usd? | |
| 22:03 | <pflores-es> - Several of UY | |
| 22:03 | <pflores-es> - Several of PY | |
| 22:04 | <pflores-es> - Werner, Chile | |
| 22:04 | <pflores-es> - Koke Contreras and Vladimir Castro Per | |
| 22:05 | <pflores-es> dirakx: podrs you speak some of Colombia? | |
| 22:06 | <pflores-es> AFTER someone from El Salvador, not whether there will be someone from Argentina (in addition to gonzalo) | |
| 22:06 | <geirea-es> I guess Ceibal want to have their space in the part of deployments | |
| 22:06 | <pflores-es> geirea: I'd like to know ... | |
| 22:06 | <geirea-es> soon as the technical team certainly going to want to participate | |
| 22:06 | <dirakx-es> pflores: wow .. then I wish I could!, But I might not be in edujam. unless there is a support of some kind .. BC and gave the necessary support. : ( | |
| 22:07 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: one of the benefits of inviting the Saturday afternoon is not involving costs, so that they may waive or charge much less | |
| 22:07 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: then it would have to be warned | |
| 22:07 | <pflores-es> dirakx: Then we talked. AC I think you can give a partial support \ | |
| 22:08 | <dirakx-es> pflores: ah well. | |
| 22:08 | <dirakx-es> want to go:). | |
| 22:08 | <gonzalo-es> dirakx: you should come! | |
| 22:08 | <gonzalo-es> dirakx: Summit Activities;) | |
| 22:08 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: you could contact someone from La Rioja? | |
| 22:09 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: not yet, ut I will travel in a couple of weeks | |
| 22:09 | <pflores-es> Well, how do you think of organizing the talks of deployments in the morning? | |
| 22:09 | <aa-es> pflores: else you need sponsorship is sascha silbe | |
| 22:09 | <pflores-es> Make a unique panel? SPECIFIC give talks? | |
| 22:09 | <dirakx-es> gonzalo: so it is! | |
| 22:10 | <dirakx-es> is very necessary!. | |
| 22:10 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: with people who already have confirmed, you can not ask them to prepare a presentation and then make a table abiwerta? | |
| 22:10 | <pflores-es> aa: I know ... but more difficult ah est | |
| 22:10 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: if it is a possibility | |
| 22:10 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: with 20 minutes to present what they want | |
| 22:10 | <pflores-es> be an open table for 2 hours? | |
| 22:10 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: and then table and questions | |
| 22:11 | <geirea-es> I like that do focus on specific issues: connectivity, logistics, training, ... | |
| 22:11 | <pflores-es> for example, to Ceibal seems to me that 20 minutes is not going to | |
| 22:11 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: Enlarged cxomo of Uruguayans are: D! | |
| 22:11 | <pflores-es> geirea: +1. And add: most important needs in Sugar | |
| 22:11 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: jua jua | |
| 22:12 | <pflores-es> habrn several exhibitors say that because of different areas ... | |
| 22:12 | <gonzalo-es> but here we can pull a slogan, for example, that everyone does n "informe de avances" and then the challenges he sees each | |
| 22:14 | <geirea-es> one problem is that the deployments want to look good and do not discuss problems | |
| 22:14 | <pflores-es> I like the proposal to build geirea of panels on topics SPECIFIC | |
| 22:14 | <pflores-es> But will focus primarily on development issues | |
| 22:14 | <geirea-es> (The deployments would be ...) | |
| 22:15 | <geirea-es> I write in the Etherpad: connectivity, logistics, training, technical support, Sugar needs, impact assessment, | |
| 22:15 | <gonzalo-es> not only of development, this is the time for deployments that have seen similar problems and to join efforts and share | |
| 22:16 | <pflores-es> And if we reach about panels on more serious problems? | |
| 22:16 | <geirea-es> if we limit to development then lose interest | |
| 22:16 | FranXOphonie has quit IRC | |
| 22:16 | meeting | <pflores-es> ok, but as "evaluaci |
| 22:16 | <pflores-es> discussed many events that ... | |
| 22:17 | <geirea-es> ok | |
| 22:17 | <gonzalo-es> and is a subject most likely to own ministries | |
| 22:18 | <FernandoSansberr-es> I have as that May 5 is the tentative date for the event Ceibal content | |
| 22:18 | <geirea-es> then we have 5 axis: connectivity, logistics, training, technical support and needs of Sugar | |
| 22:18 | <geirea-es> FernandoSansberr: chan! | |
| 22:18 | <geirea-es> must try to change it | |
| 22:18 | <pflores-es> FernandoSansberr: if you're in contact with them let them know;) | |
| 22:19 | <FernandoSansberr-es> if you notice if, what is that will not | |
| 22:19 | <pflores-es> ok ... | |
| 22:19 | <gonzalo-es> event content? | |
| 22:19 | <geirea-es> gonzalo: Rayuela Project, will present the content developed on the basis of last year called | |
| 22:20 | <geirea-es> (We have one) | |
| 22:20 | <gonzalo-es> also of you, one is open source? | |
| 22:20 | <geirea-es> gonzalo: I do not know but I doubt it | |
| 22:21 | <geirea-es> had difficulty signing contract | |
| 22:21 | <FernandoSansberr-es> if that content, say hello, chess, etc. .. | |
| 22:21 | <geirea-es> is not an issue that lawyers handle much | |
| 22:21 | <FernandoSansberr-es> do not know if open source is not heritage | |
| 22:21 | <gonzalo-es> geirea: is the only thing I do not like the ceibal | |
| 22:22 | <geirea-es> FernandoSansberr: What is heritage? is a portal? | |
| 22:22 | <FernandoSansberr-es> if | |
| 22:22 | <FernandoSansberr-es> a heritage site where heritage items rise | |
| 22:23 | <geirea-es> use drupal or something? | |
| 22:23 | <FernandoSansberr-es> if drupal | |
| 22:23 | <FernandoSansberr-es> heard once at home it would be open source, I can not confirm if this is still so | |
| 22:24 | <geirea-es> whom? | |
| 22:24 | <FernandoSansberr-es> Red Floor Design | |
| 22:26 | <aa-es> open source! = use open source;) | |
| 22:26 | silbe has quit IRC | |
| 22:26 | meeting | <aa-es> Taliban mode off |
| 22:26 | <dirakx-es> I love that translation. | |
| 22:26 | <aa-es> haha | |
| 22:26 | <gonzalo-es> ok, back to the reunion (yes, you get them out of the topic:)) | |
| 22:26 | <FernandoSansberr-es> If no idea | |
| 22:26 | <aa-es> I have to go | |
| 22:26 | <aa-es> Greetings! | |
| 22:27 | <gonzalo-es> ok, before we leave the rest | |
| 22:27 | <geirea-es> aa: chau | |
| 22:27 | <gonzalo-es> Homework: Continue looking for volunteers split as talks? | |
| 22:27 | <geirea-es> not yet cut their teeth at Friday morning, which is critical means | |
| 22:28 | <gonzalo-es> I'll try to chat with Walter about it when plugged in | |
| 22:28 | <pflores-es> Etherpad put in a proposal of panels on Saturday morning | |
| 22:28 | <pflores-es> (Space deployments experience) | |
| 22:30 | <geirea-es> missing include some logistics and training | |
| 22:30 | <gonzalo-es> all this morning? it is a bit much? | |
| 22:30 | <geirea-es> and I think that connectivity and technical support are two very different to be on the same panel | |
| 22:31 | <pflores-es> I thought of it in 2 parallel tracks | |
| 22:31 | <geirea-es> should include the safety issue? | |
| 22:31 | <pflores-es> if the problem is that there are many issues and little time, then we have to cut | |
| 22:32 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: there are going to lose half | |
| 22:32 | <pflores-es> geirea: well, at least that has been UY 90% of the development work:) | |
| 22:32 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: is it better than just 1 track? | |
| 22:32 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: if | |
| 22:32 | <geirea-es> the second and the third could not be together? | |
| 22:33 | <pflores-es> geirea: if, maybe, but the subject is too vast ... | |
| 22:35 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: you talked to Adam and Caryl about what they want to do them? | |
| 22:35 | <geirea-es> perhaps we can arrange in 3 panels: engineering aspects (connectivity, logistics support), aspects of SW (Sugar, security) and educational aspects (training, vision teacher) | |
| 22:36 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: if what happens is that so far have been unable to organize anything concrete ... | |
| 22:36 | <FernandoSansberr-es> I have to leave for home, for half an hour I will not be, I come and if they connect | |
| 22:36 | <gonzalo-es> geirea, pflores: it was that on Saturday was more oriented to teachers? | |
| 22:36 | <pflores-es> geirea: in 1 or 2 tracks? | |
| 22:36 | <geirea-es> FernandoSansberr: bye | |
| 22:36 | * FernandoSansberr has quit () | |
| 22:36 | <pflores-es> FernandoSansberr: bye! | |
| 22:37 | <geirea-es> if possible in 1 track | |
| 22:37 | <geirea-es> we have all the morning, may be more than one hour each | |
| 22:37 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: I propose to make a space for teachers on Saturday afternoon | |
| 22:37 | <pflores-es> geirea: ok, it seems very long but ... | |
| 22:38 | <pflores-es> I like the distribution of geirea | |
| 22:38 | <geirea-es> yes, there is little time | |
| 22:38 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: and the people who come to the dfeployments is technical or pedagogic? | |
| 22:38 | <geirea-es> gonzalo: good question | |
| 22:38 | <pflores-es> yes, good question, there is everything | |
| 22:38 | <pflores-es> but tell that mainly technique | |
| 22:39 | <geirea-es> could be invited to deployments that expose the main lessons learned in each of these three areas | |
| 22:40 | <gonzalo-es> wonder about connectivity, we can learn / contribute something? | |
| 22:40 | <geirea-es> gonzalo: the idea is that the deployments can also be exchanged on issues of concern | |
| 22:41 | <geirea-es> and connectivity is a real issue | |
| 22:41 | <pflores-es> 3 panels to add a panel of geirea community: interaction with the community, social Mobilisation sought / achieved, collaboration upstream ... | |
| 22:42 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: these issues if they can be more enriching | |
| 22:42 | <gonzalo-es> connectivity seems to me that everything is a subject very cold and economic / technical | |
| 22:42 | <gonzalo-es> on which we can not do much | |
| 22:42 | <geirea-es> gonzalo: we are influenced by Ceibal:) | |
| 22:42 | <pflores-es> haha | |
| 22:43 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: +1 | |
| 22:43 | <gonzalo-es> and not the same state have been fulfilled with a communications company arg private monsters, etc. | |
| 22:43 | <geirea-es> is true that we can not do much but you will not have a space for deployments to share their experiences? | |
| 22:43 | <pflores-es> Not that it is not important, but if I have to prioritize removed the Panel 1 | |
| 22:43 | <pflores-es> But we can make 2 tracks ... | |
| 22:44 | <geirea-es> one technical and one pedagogical? | |
| 22:44 | <gonzalo-es> I return to my proposal, a report asking them to arm themselves compact, current status, progress and challenges | |
| 22:45 | <gonzalo-es> and then open table | |
| 22:45 | <gonzalo-es> and a time limit for each | |
| 22:45 | <geirea-es> how many deployments we talking about? | |
| 22:45 | <pflores-es> 4-for now, expect some more ... there are several in the back to be confirmed | |
| 22:46 | <geirea-es> that the proposal may be malfunction of gonzalo | |
| 22:47 | <geirea-es> we must be clear and strict with the times allocated to each | |
| 22:47 | <geirea-es> but still is good to define some key | |
| 22:48 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: your proposal will panel the same pedagogical issues and technicians? | |
| 22:48 | <gonzalo-es> pflores: yes, it forces them to synthesize and implement the most important | |
| 22:49 | <pflores-es> ah not really agree: there is no common language | |
| 22:49 | <pflores-es> less if you need to compress much that is shared | |
| 22:50 | <gonzalo-es> We can do a test, send a mail to those who already have confirmed, and ask them what issues they consider important to them to present their deployment and how long it would need | |
| 22:50 | <gonzalo-es> and on that basis we | |
| 22:50 | <gonzalo-es> pylorus; do you think? | |
| 22:52 | <pflores-es> may be, if | |
| 22:52 | <pflores-es> I put a 3 in Etherpad IDEA | |
| 22:52 | <pflores-es> to see which you think | |
| 22:54 | <geirea-es> I think it's OK to ask the deployments and guide the activity in terms of response | |
| 22:54 | <pflores-es> well | |
| 22:54 | <geirea-es> I have not clear whether to do 2 tracks or one | |
| 22:54 | <gonzalo-es> I also | |
| 22:54 | <pflores-es> I also | |
| 22:54 | <pflores-es> :) | |
| 22:55 | <pflores-es> Well, I propose to start closing: | |
| 22:55 | <geirea-es> we have to decide is whether this will be a space in terms of deployments or if we are going to outline in terms of what we want from the sugar side | |
| 22:55 | <pflores-es> geirea: ah est la division just in my proposal of 2 tracks. 1 is oriented to the challenges of the depliyments, the other Sugar | |
| 22:56 | <gonzalo-es> geirea: lso have good information on deployments serves us all | |
| 22:56 | <geirea-es> well, hopefully the answers | |
| 22:56 | <pflores-es> ok | |
| 22:56 | <gonzalo-es> geirea: but they tell us, we have many machines, the guys are happy, so we do not serve any | |
| 22:56 | <pflores-es> I talk to the people of the deployment to see that | |
| 22:56 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: +1 | |
| 22:56 | <geirea-es> gonzalo: agreement, that is a risk, one must be careful | |
| 22:57 | <geirea-es> (I have attended too many presentations ceibal) | |
| 22:57 | <gonzalo-es> if | |
| 22:57 | <pflores-es> To be closing ... | |
| 22:57 | <pflores-es> On Friday morning, someone should send mail to those who confirmed estn preguntndoles if they would like to participate in any part of the draft of talks we have | |
| 22:57 | <gonzalo-es> but we must clarify that there is a presentation to publicco | |
| 22:57 | <gonzalo-es> will be the people they can solve their problems or not | |
| 22:57 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: podrs you address that? | |
| 22:58 | <gonzalo-es> with ls deployments? | |
| 22:58 | <pflores-es> no | |
| 22:58 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: as of Friday morning | |
| 22:58 | <gonzalo-es> ah, ok | |
| 22:58 | <pflores-es> According to clarify these things to the panelists of the deployments | |
| 22:58 | <gonzalo-es> pass me the list of confirmed? | |
| 22:59 | <gonzalo-es> (By mail, later) | |
| 22:59 | <pflores-es> gonzalo: ok | |
| 22:59 | <pflores-es> and aa stayed with starting a thread on the top of Sugar | |
| 23:00 | <pflores-es> I liked Juntra us again this week | |
| 23:00 | <geirea-es> is taking shape:) | |
| 23:00 | <pflores-es> to advertise the program more on the upcoming weekend | |
| 23:00 | <pflores-es> how to see it? | |
| 23:00 | <geirea-es> this time I can only Thursday | |
| 23:01 | <pflores-es> I served my | |
| 23:01 | <gonzalo-es> pflores, geirea, would have to change in the wiki the issue of objectives | |
| 23:01 | <geirea-es> I do not know if we will have answers soon | |
| 23:01 | <gonzalo-es> still the focus in Latin America that leaves a little from side to some people | |
| 23:02 | <gonzalo-es> I think next Monday is fine | |
| 23:02 | <gonzalo-es> and we keep abreast of mail while | |
| 23:02 | <geirea-es> objectives are the 6 points we have at first in the Etherpad? | |
| 23:02 | <gonzalo-es> geirea: if | |
| 23:03 | <pflores-es> needs to be refined a little, right? | |
| 23:03 | <geirea-es> refine and condense some | |
| 23:03 | <gonzalo-es> paa I are better than this in the wiki | |
| 23:04 | <geirea-es> I would stay with 2, 3 and 5 | |
| 23:04 | <pflores-es> true | |
| 23:05 | <geirea-es> (Main objectives) | |
| 23:05 | <pflores-es> geirea: I like to take 1, but perhaps we can put it more briefly | |
| 23:05 | mchua is now known as mchua_afk | |
| 23:05 | meeting | <geirea-es> pflores: 2 can be integrated somehow |
| 23:06 | <gonzalo-es> geirea: if you want to leave 2, 3 and 5 for me is fine | |
| 23:07 | <geirea-es> let's think a bit and exchanged proposals by email | |
| 23:07 | <gonzalo-es> ok, I have to cut | |
| 23:07 | <geirea-es> yeah, me too | |
| 23:08 | <gonzalo-es> well, hugs for both River Plate! | |
| 23:08 | <pflores-es> Ok! | |
| 23:08 | <pflores-es> up people! | |
| 23:08 | <pflores-es> This painting is beautiful! | |
| 23:08 | <pflores-es> salu2 | |
| 23:09 | <geirea-es> chau! | |
| 23:09 | geirea has left #sugar-meeting | |
| 23:09 | gonzalo has quit IRC | |
| 23:11 | dogi <dogi!~nemoc-65-96-166-32.hsd1.ma.comcast.net> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 23:20 | icarito has quit IRC | |
| 23:35 | lucian_ <lucian_!~lucian78-86-217-168.zone2.bethere.co.uk> has joined #sugar-meeting |
|
| 23:37 | lucian has quit IRC |
« Previous day | Index | Today | Next day » Channels | Search | Join