Time |
Nick |
Message |
23:36 |
meeting |
Meeting started Thu Aug 28 23:36:35 2014 UTC. The chair is bashintosh. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot. |
23:36 |
|
Useful Commands: #action #agreed #help #info #idea #link #topic #endmeeting |
23:36 |
paulcotton |
I'm going to do another big round of SugarLabs hunting as well for potential "straight to release" activities to bolster our time |
23:36 |
|
Okay, over to Matthew. |
23:36 |
bashintosh |
#topic Sugar 0.102 - Discussion about status and requirements |
23:37 |
|
so we are planning to deploy 0.102 for the coming build xo-system 2 |
23:37 |
|
however I am personally not aware of the current real status of this version of Sugar |
23:37 |
walterbender |
what is xo-system 2? |
23:38 |
bashintosh |
walterbender: please read the meeting agenda |
23:38 |
|
walterbender: https://olpcau.atlassian.net/w[…]eeting+29-08-2014 |
23:38 |
|
#info Due to the important jump forward in terms of overall system architecture, features and user experience, the next OS will be named XO-System 2 instead of 1d! |
23:38 |
|
walterbender: ^ |
23:39 |
gonzalo__ |
bashintosh, 0.102 runs ok in F20. In fact we have some problems solved |
23:39 |
|
(like the version of webkit) |
23:39 |
bashintosh |
gonzalo__: so we have a build with F20 + 102? |
23:39 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, we also have a f18 + s0.102 image, if we want to test 0.102 specifically |
23:39 |
walterbender |
bashintosh, putting text in a box makes it easier to ignore :P |
23:40 |
bashintosh |
walterbender: no comment |
23:40 |
walterbender |
that is what they put warning on cigarette cartons in boxes |
23:40 |
|
seriously |
23:40 |
gonzalo__ |
bashintosh, we run 0.102 on F20, but not in the xo |
23:40 |
bashintosh |
gonzalo__: got it - was it ever tested on XO-4? |
23:41 |
gonzalo__ |
bashintosh, are two different issues |
23:41 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, gonzalo__ we still don't have f20 + s0.102 combo |
23:41 |
gonzalo__ |
tch__, in a xo |
23:41 |
tch__ |
yes, not in a xo |
23:41 |
gonzalo__ |
tch__, but in fact sugar-build run in f20 |
23:42 |
tch__ |
yes, we have been testing f20 + 0.102 since a few months now |
23:42 |
|
in PC |
23:42 |
gonzalo__ |
bashintosh, then, to be more clear, the problem is run F20 in a xo, not run sugar 0.102 in f20 |
23:42 |
bashintosh |
what's the best way for us to get 102 on our current testing build? |
23:42 |
|
aka 10002xx4.zd |
23:43 |
gonzalo__ |
bashintosh, if you want test 0.102, we can use images based on f18 |
23:43 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, we first need to be able to rebuild f20 in the xo, |
23:44 |
bashintosh |
tch__: not sure - we can start testing with the current build IF there is a quick way to get 102 there |
23:44 |
|
has it been deployed on official Fedora repos? |
23:45 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, let me check, |
23:45 |
bashintosh |
#chair bashintosh |
23:45 |
meeting |
Current chairs: bashintosh |
23:45 |
bashintosh |
tch__: thank you |
23:46 |
walterbender |
bashintosh, Fedora is building with 102 AFAIK |
23:46 |
bashintosh |
if possible, Niraj could start testing 102 to get an overall idea of any possible major issue on the F20 built by dnarvaez_ |
23:47 |
|
walterbender: sounds promising! |
23:47 |
tch__ |
according to http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.[…]fo?packageID=8918 and http://koji.fedoraproject.org/[…]fo?packageID=4562 |
23:48 |
|
0.102 is availble from f21+ |
23:48 |
walterbender |
bashintosh, we have done a fair amount of testing of 102, but not F20 on XO |
23:48 |
bashintosh |
that would mean that 102 is officially released and not anymore beta testing, correct? |
23:48 |
walterbender |
I guess |
23:49 |
|
gonzalo__ has quit IRC |
23:49 |
bashintosh |
Niraj: we could attempt a force install http://koji.fedoraproject.org/[…]fo?buildID=552581 |
23:49 |
|
tch__: thanks! ^ |
23:49 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, we could rebuild the packages for f20 too, |
23:50 |
|
bashintosh, actually, gonzalo did that for having 0.102 in f18 |
23:50 |
|
gonzalo__ <gonzalo__!~gonzalo 190.173.22.93> has joined #olpc-au |
23:50 |
bashintosh |
tch__: I suppose we'll have to do that anyway? |
23:50 |
gonzalo__ |
sorry, lost connection agan |
23:50 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, yes |
23:50 |
Niraj |
bashintosh: ok, I will try force install of 102-f21 sugar packages on F20 build |
23:51 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, yes, we should rebuild it for f20 anyway |
23:51 |
|
Niraj, worth the try :) |
23:51 |
bashintosh |
#action Niraj will attempt try force install of 102-f21 sugar packages on F20 build |
23:52 |
|
tch__: for now can you continue with trying the build? I will finish the VM this morning |
23:52 |
gonzalo__ |
hmm, will you use the rpms in the sugarlabs images, rght? |
23:52 |
walterbender |
peterrobinson is the Fedora maintainer of Sugar upstream... he is very cooperative if you have any questions |
23:52 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, I can try using the current f20 image to re-build on a xo |
23:52 |
bashintosh |
walterbender: where do I find him? |
23:53 |
walterbender |
Peter Robinson <pbrobinson gmail.com> |
23:53 |
bashintosh |
tch__: yes you can try - after that I see the time better spent of finalising the build env, what do you think? |
23:53 |
|
walterbender: thx! |
23:55 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, our priority now is to get to a working f20 :), be it on a xo or the VM |
23:57 |
bashintosh |
tch__: agree however I am really conscious of the time spent later on to upload builds, building (slow on XO4) and the fact that an XO is not usable for testing and dev. I am happy to wait for F20 build till we have a proper building env ready |
23:57 |
satellit_e |
FYI http://wiki.sugarlabs.org/go/Fedora_20 I can make a f20 soas export from VB and upload it to sugarlabs.wiki |
23:59 |
tch__ |
bashintosh, we will have both, once we get it to work, I can easily replicate it anywhere |
23:59 |
satellit_e |
pbrobinson is usually on #fedora-arm |
23:59 |
bashintosh |
satellit_e: that would mean A LOT! Thanks satellit! |
23:59 |
satellit_e |
k will do i686 or x86_64? |
23:59 |
bashintosh |
joined.. |