« Previous day | Index | Today | Next day » Channels | Search | Join
All times shown according to UTC.
Time | Nick | Message |
---|---|---|
00:15 | m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk | |
00:15 | m_anish_afk is now known as m_anish | |
01:33 | alsroot is now known as alsroot_away | |
02:07 | Nubae has quit IRC | |
03:15 | m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk | |
05:35 | bernie has quit IRC | |
05:35 | bernie <bernie!~bernie![]() |
|
05:46 | tch has quit IRC | |
06:12 | dfarning_afk is now known as dfarning | |
06:42 | Nubae <Nubae!~Nubae![]() |
|
10:52 | Nubae__ <Nubae__!~Nubae![]() |
|
10:54 | Nubae has quit IRC | |
11:00 | Nubae___ <Nubae___!~Nubae![]() |
|
11:00 | Nubae__ has quit IRC | |
11:01 | Nubae___ is now known as Nubae | |
12:28 | silbe <silbe!~silbe![]() |
|
13:23 | tch <tch!~tch![]() |
|
13:37 | m_anish_afk is now known as m_anish | |
14:14 | m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk | |
15:37 | m_anish_afk is now known as m_anish | |
15:38 | m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk | |
15:38 | m_anish_afk is now known as m_anish | |
17:12 | SMParrish_away has quit IRC | |
17:13 | SMParrish_away <SMParrish_away!smparrish![]() |
|
18:11 | Nubae has quit IRC | |
19:39 | Nubae <Nubae!~Nubae![]() |
|
20:09 | dirakx | dfarning: I'm working in the six month perspective activity-wise ;), interesting path ahead. |
20:09 | alsroot_away is now known as alsroot | |
20:09 | dfarning | dirakx, thanks |
20:46 | m_anish is now known as m_anish_afk | |
21:56 | Nubae | wowsers... Martin XS is actally being cordial in his emails these days: |
21:57 | warning*** flood possibly*** | |
21:57 | On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Martin Langhoff <martin![]() |
|
21:57 | David, | |
21:57 | if you are going to get a dns and proxy that is patch / configured | |
21:57 | "specially" for offline browsing... you get wwwoffle? | |
21:57 | So I rephrase your question to: should we use wwwoffle or should we | |
21:57 | rewrite wwwoffle? | |
21:57 | I say we use it :-) | |
21:57 | m | |
21:57 | On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 1:33 PM, David Van Assche <dvanassche![]() |
|
21:57 | > Hi Martin, sorry for briefly interrupting you. In your opinion would it be | |
21:57 | > better to go with WWWOffle for capturing offline content in a cache, or | |
21:57 | > using SQUID together with the tri-state patch which allows for 3 kinds of | |
21:57 | > off/online modes. One where Cache has a huge TTL, the other where it has non | |
21:57 | > so everything is always relevant, or a third option for intermittent | |
21:57 | > connections where its the best of both worlds, when no net, cache TTL is | |
21:57 | > maxed out again) and when net comes back its at minimal TTL. This sounds | |
21:57 | > relatively useful to me, though the patch, albeit modified in 2010, since | |
21:57 | > its first release in 2001. Obviously a local DNS server would still be | |
21:57 | > necessary to choose which sites to send to the local | |
21:57 | > webserver/backend/whatever solution. For DNS I've heard good things about | |
21:58 | apologizes | |
22:10 | silbe | +1 on using wwwoffle |
22:11 | has been using it for several years on laptops | |
22:13 | it would be interesting to use wwwoffle on clients and configure it to use / not use a parent proxy (on the XS) dynamically depending on what network we're connecting on. IIRC there's some set-proxy-via-DHCP option is Mozillas WPAD stuff. | |
22:14 | (local storage on XOs might be too limited to make it really interesting for deployments, though) | |
22:37 | Nubae has quit IRC | |
23:20 | silbe has quit IRC | |
23:31 | dirakx has quit IRC | |
23:33 | dirakx <dirakx!rafael![]() |
« Previous day | Index | Today | Next day » Channels | Search | Join